# GLM-5V-Turbo vs GPT-5 Pro

> GPT-5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 43.1 on the Noometry Index. GLM-5V-Turbo costs 22× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/glm-5v-turbo-vs-gpt-5-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in knowledge, where GPT-5 Pro leads 56.2 to 39.9.
- GLM-5V-Turbo is cheaper at $1.20 / $4 per million input/output tokens, against $15 / $120 for GPT-5 Pro.
- GPT-5 Pro accepts more context: 400K tokens versus 200K.

## Snapshot

| | GLM-5V-Turbo | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 43.1 | 46.2 |
| Rank | 86 | 58 |
| Context | 200K | 400K |
| Input $/M | $1.20 | $15 |
| Output $/M | $4 | $120 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- GLM-5V-Turbo: 41.8 (#105)
- GPT-5 Pro: 43.4 (#77)

| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1400 | — |
| WeirdML | — | 60.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1467 | — |
| AlgoTune | — | 1.31 |

## Reasoning

- GLM-5V-Turbo: 28.5 (#87)
- GPT-5 Pro: 39.2 (#52)

| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 18.3% |
| SimpleBench | — | 61.6% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 76.8% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 70.2% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 18.8% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1443 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 150.26 |

## Math

- GLM-5V-Turbo: 36.6 (#109)
- GPT-5 Pro: 48.0 (#53)

| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 55.8% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 19.5% |
| LMArena Math | 1440 | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 14.6% |

## Knowledge

- GLM-5V-Turbo: 39.9 (#113)
- GPT-5 Pro: 56.2 (#39)

| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 31.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1451 | — |

## Multimodal

- GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.1 (#41)
- GPT-5 Pro: —

| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1264 | — |
| LMArena Document | 1416 | — |

## Multilingual

- GLM-5V-Turbo: 53.2 (#69)
- GPT-5 Pro: —

| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1420 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1488 | — |
| LMArena French | 1443 | — |
| LMArena German | 1422 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1399 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1432 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1446 | — |

## Instruction Following

- GLM-5V-Turbo: 75.1 (#75)
- GPT-5 Pro: —

| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1422 | — |

## Long Context

- GLM-5V-Turbo: 44.0 (#76)
- GPT-5 Pro: —

| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1439 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- GLM-5V-Turbo: 62.6 (#69)
- GPT-5 Pro: —

| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1437 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1414 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1432 | — |

## FAQ

### Is GLM-5V-Turbo better than GPT-5 Pro?

GPT-5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 43.1 on the Noometry Index. GLM-5V-Turbo costs 22× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, GLM-5V-Turbo or GPT-5 Pro?

GLM-5V-Turbo is cheaper. It lists at $1.20 per million input tokens and $4 per million output tokens; GPT-5 Pro lists at $15 and $120.

### Is GLM-5V-Turbo or GPT-5 Pro better for coding?

GPT-5 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.4 versus 41.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-5 Pro does, with 400K tokens against 200K.

### How many benchmarks do GLM-5V-Turbo and GPT-5 Pro share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-5V-Turbo has 19 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5 Pro has 12.