# GLM-5V-Turbo vs GPT-5-Codex

> GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/glm-5v-turbo-vs-gpt-5-codex
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- GLM-5V-Turbo is cheaper at $1.20 / $4 per million input/output tokens, against $1.25 / $10 for GPT-5-Codex.
- GPT-5-Codex accepts more context: 400K tokens versus 200K.

## Snapshot

| | GLM-5V-Turbo | GPT-5-Codex |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 43.1 | 37.3 |
| Rank | 86 | 190 |
| Context | 200K | 400K |
| Input $/M | $1.20 | $1.25 |
| Output $/M | $4 | $10 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- GLM-5V-Turbo: 41.8 (#105)
- GPT-5-Codex: 41.9 (#100)

| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | GPT-5-Codex |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1400 | — |
| WeirdML | — | 54.5% |
| LMArena Coding | 1467 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- GLM-5V-Turbo: —
- GPT-5-Codex: 30.8 (#66)

| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | GPT-5-Codex |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 44.3% |

## Reasoning

- GLM-5V-Turbo: 28.5 (#87)
- GPT-5-Codex: 30.0 (#80)

| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | GPT-5-Codex |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 70.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1443 | — |

## Math

- GLM-5V-Turbo: 36.6 (#109)
- GPT-5-Codex: —

| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | GPT-5-Codex |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1440 | — |

## Knowledge

- GLM-5V-Turbo: 39.9 (#113)
- GPT-5-Codex: —

| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | GPT-5-Codex |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1451 | — |

## Multimodal

- GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.1 (#41)
- GPT-5-Codex: —

| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | GPT-5-Codex |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1264 | — |
| LMArena Document | 1416 | — |

## Multilingual

- GLM-5V-Turbo: 53.2 (#69)
- GPT-5-Codex: —

| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | GPT-5-Codex |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1420 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1488 | — |
| LMArena French | 1443 | — |
| LMArena German | 1422 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1399 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1432 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1446 | — |

## Instruction Following

- GLM-5V-Turbo: 75.1 (#75)
- GPT-5-Codex: —

| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | GPT-5-Codex |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1422 | — |

## Long Context

- GLM-5V-Turbo: 44.0 (#76)
- GPT-5-Codex: —

| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | GPT-5-Codex |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1439 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- GLM-5V-Turbo: 62.6 (#69)
- GPT-5-Codex: —

| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | GPT-5-Codex |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1437 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1414 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1432 | — |

## FAQ

### Is GLM-5V-Turbo better than GPT-5-Codex?

GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, GLM-5V-Turbo or GPT-5-Codex?

GLM-5V-Turbo is cheaper. It lists at $1.20 per million input tokens and $4 per million output tokens; GPT-5-Codex lists at $1.25 and $10.

### Is GLM-5V-Turbo or GPT-5-Codex better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (41.8 vs 41.9); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-5-Codex does, with 400K tokens against 200K.

### How many benchmarks do GLM-5V-Turbo and GPT-5-Codex share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-5V-Turbo has 19 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5-Codex has 3.
