# GLM-5 vs Wizardlm 13b

> GLM-5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.9 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/glm-5-vs-wizardlm-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-5 scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-5 leads 66.2 to 30.7.

## Snapshot

| | GLM-5 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 45.9 | 30.8 |
| Rank | 59 | 272 |
| Context | 205K | — |
| Input $/M | $1 | — |
| Output $/M | $3.20 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- GLM-5: 49.0 (#47)
- Wizardlm 13b: 29.6 (#293)

| Benchmark | GLM-5 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1461 | 1035 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 72.1% | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 72.8% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1434 | — |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | 69.7% | — |
| WeirdML | 48.2% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 765.62 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- GLM-5: 30.9 (#65)
- Wizardlm 13b: —

| Benchmark | GLM-5 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 52.4% | — |
| τ²-bench Airline | 82.5% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 9.8% | — |
| τ²-bench Retail | 73.7% | — |
| τ²-bench Telecom | 86.8% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 4,432 | — |

## Reasoning

- GLM-5: 27.6 (#100)
- Wizardlm 13b: 18.5 (#265)

| Benchmark | GLM-5 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1451 | 1018 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 4.9% | — |
| SimpleBench | 53.2% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 75% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 74.8% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 44.7% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 10% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 145.84 | — |
| ForecastBench | 61 | — |

## Math

- GLM-5: 44.8 (#66)
- Wizardlm 13b: 27.8 (#235)

| Benchmark | GLM-5 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1440 | 1017 |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 65.7% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 80% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 16.4% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 2.1% | — |

## Knowledge

- GLM-5: 52.2 (#59)
- Wizardlm 13b: —

| Benchmark | GLM-5 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 87.8% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 10.1% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1454 | — |

## Multilingual

- GLM-5: 53.9 (#57)
- Wizardlm 13b: 27.3 (#272)

| Benchmark | GLM-5 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1430 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1511 | 1023 |
| LMArena French | 1455 | — |
| LMArena German | 1445 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1416 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1421 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1436 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1452 | — |

## Instruction Following

- GLM-5: 75.4 (#64)
- Wizardlm 13b: 53.7 (#280)

| Benchmark | GLM-5 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1427 | 1049 |

## Long Context

- GLM-5: 44.6 (#58)
- Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#268)

| Benchmark | GLM-5 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1446 | 1054 |
| CL-bench | 18.7% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- GLM-5: 66.2 (#38)
- Wizardlm 13b: 30.7 (#282)

| Benchmark | GLM-5 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1446 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1438 | 1090 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1456 | 1047 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1601 | — |

## FAQ

### Is GLM-5 better than Wizardlm 13b?

GLM-5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.9 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is GLM-5 or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?

GLM-5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.0 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do GLM-5 and Wizardlm 13b share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-5 has 45 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.