# GLM-5.3 vs Granite 4.0 H Small

> GLM-5.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/glm-5-3-vs-ibm-granite-h-small
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-5.3 scores higher in 8 categories and Granite 4.0 H Small in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-5.3 leads 75.7 to 43.8.

## Snapshot

| | GLM-5.3 | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | IBM |
| Noometry Index | 54.8 | 36.5 |
| Rank | 26 | 214 |
| Context | 1M | — |
| Input $/M | $1.40 | — |
| Output $/M | $4.40 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- GLM-5.3: 59.5 (#14)
- Granite 4.0 H Small: 36.4 (#209)

| Benchmark | GLM-5.3 | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1496 | 1249 |
| DeepSWE | 69% | — |
| FrontierCode | 40.1% | — |
| CursorBench | 42.6% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1622 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 30.2% | — |
| SciCode | 59% | — |
| WeirdML | 75.4% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,317 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- GLM-5.3: 36.4 (#38)
- Granite 4.0 H Small: —

| Benchmark | GLM-5.3 | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 56.6% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 8,164 | — |

## Reasoning

- GLM-5.3: 46.1 (#46)
- Granite 4.0 H Small: 24.4 (#163)

| Benchmark | GLM-5.3 | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1489 | 1240 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 74.2% | — |
| CritPt | 19.1% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 21% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 33% | — |
| DTBench | 87.7% | — |
| LMCA | 55.5% | — |
| Bench to the Future 3 | 0.15 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 155.61 | — |

## Math

- GLM-5.3: 62.3 (#33)
- Granite 4.0 H Small: 31.4 (#223)

| Benchmark | GLM-5.3 | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1489 | 1247 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 68.8% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 29.3% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 91.1% | — |
| ProofBench | 49% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 29.6% |

## Knowledge

- GLM-5.3: 58.3 (#37)
- Granite 4.0 H Small: 32.0 (#215)

| Benchmark | GLM-5.3 | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1516 | 1251 |
| GPQA Diamond | 90.9% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 41% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 56.9% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.2% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 38.3% |

## Multilingual

- GLM-5.3: 55.7 (#28)
- Granite 4.0 H Small: 38.6 (#228)

| Benchmark | GLM-5.3 | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1457 | 1216 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1528 | 1249 |
| LMArena Russian | 1463 | 1201 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1460 | 1258 |
| LMArena French | 1499 | — |
| LMArena German | 1499 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1453 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1472 | — |

## Instruction Following

- GLM-5.3: 77.5 (#23)
- Granite 4.0 H Small: 68.7 (#183)

| Benchmark | GLM-5.3 | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1477 | 1222 |
| IFEval | — | 89% |

## Long Context

- GLM-5.3: 45.4 (#41)
- Granite 4.0 H Small: 37.7 (#213)

| Benchmark | GLM-5.3 | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1482 | 1242 |

## Writing & Preference

- GLM-5.3: 75.7 (#6)
- Granite 4.0 H Small: 43.8 (#227)

| Benchmark | GLM-5.3 | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1471 | 1241 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1457 | 1211 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1472 | 1242 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 2075 | — |
| WildBench | — | 73.9% |

## FAQ

### Is GLM-5.3 better than Granite 4.0 H Small?

GLM-5.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Is GLM-5.3 or Granite 4.0 H Small better for coding?

GLM-5.3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 59.5 versus 36.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do GLM-5.3 and Granite 4.0 H Small share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-5.3 has 42 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.0 H Small has 19.