# GLM-5.3-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Super

> GLM-5.3-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.6 to 39.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/glm-5-3-flash-vs-nemotron-3-super
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 18

## Summary

- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-5.3-Flash scores higher in 8 categories and Nemotron 3 Super in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where GLM-5.3-Flash leads 58.4 to 38.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 51.6% for GLM-5.3-Flash and 36% for Nemotron 3 Super.
- Nemotron 3 Super is cheaper at $0.08 / $0.45 per million input/output tokens, against $0.15 / $0.50 for GLM-5.3-Flash.
- GLM-5.3-Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.

## Snapshot

| | GLM-5.3-Flash | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | NVIDIA |
| Noometry Index | 49.6 | 39.6 |
| Rank | 45 | 147 |
| Context | 1M | 262K |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | $0.08 |
| Output $/M | $0.50 | $0.45 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- GLM-5.3-Flash: 53.7 (#26)
- Nemotron 3 Super: 38.9 (#153)

| Benchmark | GLM-5.3-Flash | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 51.6% | 36% |
| LMArena Coding | 1506 | 1403 |
| ALE-Bench | 303.55 | 213.9 |
| DeepSWE | 63.4% | — |
| FrontierCode | 31.8% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1614 | — |
| WeirdML | — | 38% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- GLM-5.3-Flash: 34.3 (#41)
- Nemotron 3 Super: —

| Benchmark | GLM-5.3-Flash | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 52.8% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 14% | — |

## Reasoning

- GLM-5.3-Flash: 31.7 (#69)
- Nemotron 3 Super: 17.9 (#274)

| Benchmark | GLM-5.3-Flash | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 15.4% | 3.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1490 | 1386 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 15.4% |
| Chess Puzzles | 14% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 8% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 52.5% | — |
| Bench to the Future 3 | 0.15 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 151.9 | — |

## Math

- GLM-5.3-Flash: 53.1 (#38)
- Nemotron 3 Super: 37.6 (#95)

| Benchmark | GLM-5.3-Flash | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1499 | 1381 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 55.8% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 17.1% | — |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 60.4% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 93.9% | — |
| ProofBench | 21% | — |

## Knowledge

- GLM-5.3-Flash: 58.4 (#33)
- Nemotron 3 Super: 38.2 (#136)

| Benchmark | GLM-5.3-Flash | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1512 | 1397 |
| GPQA Diamond | 90.2% | — |

## Multimodal

- GLM-5.3-Flash: 42.6 (#25)
- Nemotron 3 Super: —

| Benchmark | GLM-5.3-Flash | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1304 | — |

## Multilingual

- GLM-5.3-Flash: 56.2 (#24)
- Nemotron 3 Super: 48.6 (#139)

| Benchmark | GLM-5.3-Flash | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1462 | 1356 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1529 | 1430 |
| LMArena French | 1495 | 1404 |
| LMArena German | 1457 | 1341 |
| LMArena Russian | 1472 | 1336 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1471 | 1417 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1420 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1443 | — |

## Instruction Following

- GLM-5.3-Flash: 77.8 (#17)
- Nemotron 3 Super: 71.4 (#149)

| Benchmark | GLM-5.3-Flash | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1480 | 1347 |

## Long Context

- GLM-5.3-Flash: 45.3 (#41)
- Nemotron 3 Super: 41.5 (#134)

| Benchmark | GLM-5.3-Flash | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1479 | 1362 |

## Writing & Preference

- GLM-5.3-Flash: 65.4 (#49)
- Nemotron 3 Super: 56.1 (#135)

| Benchmark | GLM-5.3-Flash | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1471 | 1378 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1440 | 1317 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1471 | 1369 |

## FAQ

### Is GLM-5.3-Flash better than Nemotron 3 Super?

GLM-5.3-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.6 to 39.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, GLM-5.3-Flash or Nemotron 3 Super?

Nemotron 3 Super is cheaper. It lists at $0.08 per million input tokens and $0.45 per million output tokens; GLM-5.3-Flash lists at $0.15 and $0.50.

### Is GLM-5.3-Flash or Nemotron 3 Super better for coding?

GLM-5.3-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.7 versus 38.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

GLM-5.3-Flash does, with 1M tokens against 262K.

### How many benchmarks do GLM-5.3-Flash and Nemotron 3 Super share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-5.3-Flash has 36 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 3 Super has 21.