# GLM-5.2 vs Kimi K2.7 Code

> GLM-5.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.1 to 43.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/glm-5-2-vs-kimi-k2-7-code
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 19

## Summary

- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-5.2 scores higher in 5 categories and Kimi K2.7 Code in 0 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in agentic & tool use, where GLM-5.2 leads 32.4 to 24.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is FrontierMath Tier 4: 29.3% for GLM-5.2 and 12.2% for Kimi K2.7 Code.
- Kimi K2.7 Code is cheaper at $0.95 / $4 per million input/output tokens, against $1.40 / $4.40 for GLM-5.2.
- GLM-5.2 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.

## Snapshot

| | GLM-5.2 | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Moonshot AI |
| Noometry Index | 51.1 | 43.3 |
| Rank | 44 | 94 |
| Context | 1M | 262K |
| Input $/M | $1.40 | $0.95 |
| Output $/M | $4.40 | $4 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- GLM-5.2: 51.3 (#41)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 42.9 (#95)

| Benchmark | GLM-5.2 | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | 43.8% | 30.5% |
| FrontierCode | 24.5% | 30.1% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1603 | 1473 |
| SciCode | 50.5% | 47.5% |
| WeirdML | 70.1% | 54.1% |
| ALE-Bench | 1,047 | 886.23 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 78.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1485 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- GLM-5.2: 32.4 (#63)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 24.0 (#122)

| Benchmark | GLM-5.2 | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 45.2% | 37.6% |
| GBAEval | 0% | 0.9% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 8,314 | 5,083 |
| τ²-bench Banking | 37.1% | — |
| PostTrainBench | 31.7% | — |

## Reasoning

- GLM-5.2: 42.3 (#52)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 39.0 (#61)

| Benchmark | GLM-5.2 | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 58.8% | 57.9% |
| CritPt | 20.9% | 10% |
| Chess Puzzles | 21% | 21% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 55.6% | 48.8% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 151.78 | 149.97 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 22.8% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 62.6% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 74.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 77% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 9.5% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1480 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 19% | — |
| DTBench | 93.6% | — |
| LMCA | 45.8% | — |

## Math

- GLM-5.2: 55.7 (#43)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 52.9 (#48)

| Benchmark | GLM-5.2 | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 59.2% | 54% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 29.3% | 12.2% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 86.4% | 95.6% |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 67.6% | — |
| ProofBench | 35% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1482 | — |

## Knowledge

- GLM-5.2: 57.1 (#40)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 53.5 (#57)

| Benchmark | GLM-5.2 | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 91.9% | 87.9% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 34.2% | 36.5% |
| LMArena Expert | 1486 | — |

## Multilingual

- GLM-5.2: 55.8 (#26)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: —

| Benchmark | GLM-5.2 | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1459 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1519 | — |
| LMArena French | 1479 | — |
| LMArena German | 1468 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1451 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1445 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1466 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1477 | — |

## Instruction Following

- GLM-5.2: 76.9 (#34)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: —

| Benchmark | GLM-5.2 | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1465 | — |

## Long Context

- GLM-5.2: 45.3 (#43)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: —

| Benchmark | GLM-5.2 | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1479 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- GLM-5.2: 70.4 (#21)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: —

| Benchmark | GLM-5.2 | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1470 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1462 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1757 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1222 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1469 | — |

## FAQ

### Is GLM-5.2 better than Kimi K2.7 Code?

GLM-5.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.1 to 43.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, GLM-5.2 or Kimi K2.7 Code?

Kimi K2.7 Code is cheaper. It lists at $0.95 per million input tokens and $4 per million output tokens; GLM-5.2 lists at $1.40 and $4.40.

### Is GLM-5.2 or Kimi K2.7 Code better for coding?

GLM-5.2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.3 versus 42.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

GLM-5.2 does, with 1M tokens against 262K.

### How many benchmarks do GLM-5.2 and Kimi K2.7 Code share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-5.2 has 51 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.7 Code has 19.