# GLM-5.1 vs Ministral 8B

> GLM-5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.6 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index. Ministral 8B costs 21× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GLM-5.1's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/glm-5-1-vs-ministral-8b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-5.1 scores higher in 9 categories and Ministral 8B in 0 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where GLM-5.1 leads 55.0 to 12.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 89.9% for GLM-5.1 and 27.1% for Ministral 8B.
- Ministral 8B is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.10 per million input/output tokens, against $1.40 / $4.40 for GLM-5.1.
- GLM-5.1 accepts more context: 200K tokens versus 128K.

## Snapshot

| | GLM-5.1 | Ministral 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 47.6 | 27.8 |
| Rank | 51 | 321 |
| Context | 200K | 128K |
| Input $/M | $1.40 | $0.10 |
| Output $/M | $4.40 | $0.10 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- GLM-5.1: 48.5 (#52)
- Ministral 8B: 34.4 (#226)

| Benchmark | GLM-5.1 | Ministral 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1486 | 1202 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 74.2% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1509 | — |
| SciCode | 43.8% | — |
| WeirdML | 57.1% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 887.1 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- GLM-5.1: 24.8 (#106)
- Ministral 8B: 16.2 (#140)

| Benchmark | GLM-5.1 | Ministral 8B |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 40.9% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 11.1% |
| ExploitBench | 18.1% | — |
| GBAEval | 0% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 5,634 | — |

## Reasoning

- GLM-5.1: 38.2 (#57)
- Ministral 8B: 17.7 (#279)

| Benchmark | GLM-5.1 | Ministral 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1472 | 1191 |
| SimpleBench | 55.1% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 77.7% | — |
| CritPt | 4.6% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 19% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 69.8% | — |
| DTBench | — | 45.7% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 149.86 | — |

## Math

- GLM-5.1: 49.0 (#48)
- Ministral 8B: 23.7 (#262)

| Benchmark | GLM-5.1 | Ministral 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1472 | 1188 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 36.8% | — |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 67.1% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 93.3% | — |
| ProofBench | 22.2% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 14.9% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 33.4% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 12.5% | — |

## Knowledge

- GLM-5.1: 55.0 (#45)
- Ministral 8B: 12.5 (#292)

| Benchmark | GLM-5.1 | Ministral 8B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 89.9% | 27.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1477 | 1170 |
| SimpleQA Verified | 34% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 7.4% |

## Multilingual

- GLM-5.1: 55.2 (#34)
- Ministral 8B: 35.3 (#242)

| Benchmark | GLM-5.1 | Ministral 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1448 | 1165 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1516 | 1193 |
| LMArena Russian | 1453 | 1195 |
| LMArena French | 1478 | — |
| LMArena German | 1466 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1436 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1423 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1467 | — |

## Instruction Following

- GLM-5.1: 76.5 (#41)
- Ministral 8B: 60.7 (#245)

| Benchmark | GLM-5.1 | Ministral 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1451 | 1161 |

## Long Context

- GLM-5.1: 44.9 (#51)
- Ministral 8B: 36.7 (#222)

| Benchmark | GLM-5.1 | Ministral 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1467 | 1212 |

## Writing & Preference

- GLM-5.1: 67.2 (#29)
- Ministral 8B: 39.8 (#241)

| Benchmark | GLM-5.1 | Ministral 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1462 | 1191 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1454 | 1175 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1473 | 1166 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1592 | — |

## FAQ

### Is GLM-5.1 better than Ministral 8B?

GLM-5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.6 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index. Ministral 8B costs 21× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GLM-5.1's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, GLM-5.1 or Ministral 8B?

Ministral 8B is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.10 per million output tokens; GLM-5.1 lists at $1.40 and $4.40.

### Is GLM-5.1 or Ministral 8B better for coding?

GLM-5.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.5 versus 34.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

GLM-5.1 does, with 200K tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do GLM-5.1 and Ministral 8B share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-5.1 has 41 scored results on Noometry and Ministral 8B has 17.