# GLM-4.7 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

> MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 42.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/glm-4-7-vs-mimo-v2-6-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.7 scores higher in 1 category and MiMo-V2.6-Pro in 8 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 43.1 to 24.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is ProofBench: 6% for GLM-4.7 and 70% for MiMo-V2.6-Pro.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is cheaper at $0.43 / $0.87 per million input/output tokens, against $0.60 / $2.20 for GLM-4.7.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 205K.

## Snapshot

| | GLM-4.7 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 42.0 | 50.3 |
| Rank | 124 | 49 |
| Context | 205K | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | $0.60 | $0.43 |
| Output $/M | $2.20 | $0.87 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- GLM-4.7: 44.0 (#79)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 55.5 (#23)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1435 | 1629 |
| SciCode | 45.1% | 60.9% |
| LMArena Coding | 1454 | 1534 |
| ALE-Bench | 399.48 | 1,158 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- GLM-4.7: 26.5 (#103)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.5 (#35)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 33.4% | — |
| APEX-Agents | — | 59.5% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 2,377 | — |

## Reasoning

- GLM-4.7: 24.3 (#164)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.1 (#50)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 1.7% | 26.6% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1443 | 1512 |
| SimpleBench | 47.7% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 143.51 | — |

## Math

- GLM-4.7: 38.6 (#135)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 54.5 (#45)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 6% | 70% |
| LMArena Math | 1423 | 1494 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 83.3% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 2.4% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 0% | — |

## Knowledge

- GLM-4.7: 47.0 (#80)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.5 (#92)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1424 | 1543 |
| GPQA Diamond | 83.3% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 32.2% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 11.7% | — |

## Multimodal

- GLM-4.7: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.8 (#43)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1264 |

## Multilingual

- GLM-4.7: 52.8 (#79)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 56.9 (#14)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1417 | 1474 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1495 | 1529 |
| LMArena Russian | 1423 | 1480 |
| LMArena French | 1432 | — |
| LMArena German | 1424 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1439 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1399 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1434 | — |

## Instruction Following

- GLM-4.7: 74.4 (#95)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#12)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1411 | 1493 |

## Long Context

- GLM-4.7: 42.8 (#116)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#27)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1432 | 1501 |
| CL-bench | 15.9% | — |
| CL-bench Life | 10.9% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- GLM-4.7: 60.9 (#93)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.8 (#33)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1435 | 1492 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1401 | 1468 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1446 | 1464 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1413 | — |

## FAQ

### Is GLM-4.7 better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 42.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, GLM-4.7 or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.43 per million input tokens and $0.87 per million output tokens; GLM-4.7 lists at $0.60 and $2.20.

### Is GLM-4.7 or MiMo-V2.6-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 44.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 205K.

### How many benchmarks do GLM-4.7 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.7 has 36 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 19.