# GLM-4.7 vs Kimi K2.5 Instant

> Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 42.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/glm-4-7-vs-kimi-k2-5-instant
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.7 scores higher in 4 categories and Kimi K2.5 Instant in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where GLM-4.7 leads 47.0 to 40.2.

## Snapshot

| | GLM-4.7 | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Moonshot AI |
| Noometry Index | 42.0 | 43.6 |
| Rank | 124 | 89 |
| Context | 205K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.60 | — |
| Output $/M | $2.20 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- GLM-4.7: 44.0 (#79)
- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 42.6 (#97)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1435 | 1404 |
| LMArena Coding | 1454 | 1484 |
| SciCode | 45.1% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 399.48 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- GLM-4.7: 26.5 (#103)
- Kimi K2.5 Instant: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 33.4% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 2,377 | — |

## Reasoning

- GLM-4.7: 24.3 (#164)
- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 29.7 (#90)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1443 | 1443 |
| SimpleBench | 47.7% | — |
| CritPt | 1.7% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 143.51 | — |

## Math

- GLM-4.7: 38.6 (#135)
- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 39.4 (#105)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1423 | 1442 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 83.3% | — |
| ProofBench | 6% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 2.4% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 0% | — |

## Knowledge

- GLM-4.7: 47.0 (#80)
- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 40.2 (#123)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1424 | 1440 |
| GPQA Diamond | 83.3% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 32.2% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 11.7% | — |

## Multimodal

- GLM-4.7: —
- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 40.2 (#50)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1254 |

## Multilingual

- GLM-4.7: 52.8 (#79)
- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 52.0 (#94)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1417 | 1406 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1495 | 1449 |
| LMArena French | 1432 | 1403 |
| LMArena German | 1424 | 1413 |
| LMArena Korean | 1399 | 1378 |
| LMArena Russian | 1423 | 1404 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1434 | 1447 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1439 | — |

## Instruction Following

- GLM-4.7: 74.4 (#95)
- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 75.3 (#65)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1411 | 1430 |

## Long Context

- GLM-4.7: 42.8 (#116)
- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 43.9 (#83)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1432 | 1435 |
| CL-bench | 15.9% | — |
| CL-bench Life | 10.9% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- GLM-4.7: 60.9 (#93)
- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 60.6 (#95)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1435 | 1420 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1401 | 1381 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1446 | 1427 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1413 | — |

## FAQ

### Is GLM-4.7 better than Kimi K2.5 Instant?

Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 42.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is GLM-4.7 or Kimi K2.5 Instant better for coding?

GLM-4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 42.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do GLM-4.7 and Kimi K2.5 Instant share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.7 has 36 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.5 Instant has 18.