# GLM-4.7 vs Grok 3

> GLM-4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 39.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/glm-4-7-vs-grok-3
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 25

## Summary

- They share 25 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.7 scores higher in 7 categories and Grok 3 in 2 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GLM-4.7 leads 23.7 to 13.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 83.3% for GLM-4.7 and 55.6% for Grok 3.
- GLM-4.7 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | GLM-4.7 | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 41.7 | 39.6 |
| Rank | 117 | 150 |
| Context | 205K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.60 | — |
| Output $/M | $2.20 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- GLM-4.7: 43.6 (#74)
- Grok 3: 41.5 (#113)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1454 | 1432 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 53.3% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1435 | — |
| SciCode | 45.1% | — |
| WeirdML | — | 37.2% |
| ALE-Bench | 399.48 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- GLM-4.7: 26.4 (#96)
- Grok 3: 30.2 (#69)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 33.4% | — |
| BALROG | — | 29.5% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 2,377 | — |

## Reasoning

- GLM-4.7: 23.7 (#161)
- Grok 3: 13.8 (#322)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 47.7% | 36.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1443 | 1433 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 143.53 | 138.34 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 61.3% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 5.5% |
| CritPt | 1.7% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 6% | — |

## Math

- GLM-4.7: 37.7 (#92)
- Grok 3: 36.2 (#122)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 83.3% | 55.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1423 | 1390 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 2.4% | 3.8% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 0% | 0% |
| ProofBench | 6% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 46.4% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 88.7% |

## Knowledge

- GLM-4.7: 47.0 (#74)
- Grok 3: 46.0 (#76)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 83.3% | 75.8% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 11.7% | 5.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1424 | 1420 |
| SimpleQA Verified | 32.2% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 78.8% |
| Confabulations | — | 14.2% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 65% |

## Multilingual

- GLM-4.7: 53.0 (#75)
- Grok 3: 52.5 (#81)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1417 | 1411 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1495 | 1448 |
| LMArena French | 1432 | 1460 |
| LMArena German | 1426 | 1431 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1439 | 1389 |
| LMArena Korean | 1401 | 1374 |
| LMArena Russian | 1423 | 1416 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1433 | 1417 |

## Instruction Following

- GLM-4.7: 74.6 (#90)
- Grok 3: 75.2 (#69)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1411 | 1409 |
| IFEval | — | 88.4% |

## Long Context

- GLM-4.7: 42.8 (#111)
- Grok 3: 38.7 (#187)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1432 | 1439 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 58.3% |
| CL-bench | 15.9% | — |
| CL-bench Life | 10.9% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- GLM-4.7: 61.1 (#89)
- Grok 3: 56.0 (#136)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1436 | 1426 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1401 | 1414 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1413 | 1186 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1446 | 1424 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 76.4% |
| WildBench | — | 84.9% |

## FAQ

### Is GLM-4.7 better than Grok 3?

GLM-4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 39.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is GLM-4.7 or Grok 3 better for coding?

GLM-4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.6 versus 41.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do GLM-4.7 and Grok 3 share?

25 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.7 has 36 scored results on Noometry and Grok 3 has 40.