# GLM-4.7-Flash vs QwQ-32B

> GLM-4.7-Flash and QwQ-32B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.4 vs 39.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/glm-4-7-flash-vs-qwq-32b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 20

## Summary

- They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.7-Flash scores higher in 2 categories and QwQ-32B in 6 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where QwQ-32B leads 49.0 to 40.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Chess Puzzles: 0% for GLM-4.7-Flash and 5% for QwQ-32B.

## Snapshot

| | GLM-4.7-Flash | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 38.4 | 39.4 |
| Rank | 175 | 153 |
| Context | 200K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.06 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.40 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.0 (#133)
- QwQ-32B: 34.9 (#220)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1383 | 1333 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 20.9% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 44.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 72.2% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 54.4% |

## Reasoning

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 20.2 (#224)
- QwQ-32B: 22.9 (#171)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | 5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1356 | 1326 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 83.5% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 65% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 137.6 |
| ForecastBench | — | 58.3 |
| LiveBench | — | 72% |

## Math

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 34.4 (#159)
- QwQ-32B: 36.2 (#123)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 58.3% | 59.2% |
| LMArena Math | 1354 | 1359 |
| LiveBench Math | — | 77.8% |

## Knowledge

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 35.4 (#177)
- QwQ-32B: 37.2 (#150)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 60.5% | 65.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1357 | 1323 |
| Confabulations | — | 15.6% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 46.8 (#152)
- QwQ-32B: 45.0 (#171)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1331 | 1306 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1403 | 1378 |
| LMArena French | 1332 | 1337 |
| LMArena German | 1336 | 1313 |
| LMArena Korean | 1284 | 1278 |
| LMArena Russian | 1333 | 1297 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1351 | 1353 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1263 |

## Instruction Following

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 70.3 (#162)
- QwQ-32B: 72.8 (#131)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1327 | 1297 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 81.8% |

## Long Context

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.9 (#143)
- QwQ-32B: 49.0 (#11)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1345 | 1308 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 83.3% |

## Writing & Preference

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 47.7 (#206)
- QwQ-32B: 50.9 (#175)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1351 | 1329 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1297 | 1288 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1125 | 1257 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1342 | 1314 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 80.2% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 51.4% |

## FAQ

### Is GLM-4.7-Flash better than QwQ-32B?

GLM-4.7-Flash and QwQ-32B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.4 vs 39.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is GLM-4.7-Flash or QwQ-32B better for coding?

GLM-4.7-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 34.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do GLM-4.7-Flash and QwQ-32B share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.7-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and QwQ-32B has 36.