# GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3.6 Flash

> GLM-4.7-Flash and Qwen3.6 Flash score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.4 vs 38.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/glm-4-7-flash-vs-qwen3-6-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 3

## Summary

- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.7-Flash scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.6 Flash in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.6 Flash leads 28.4 to 20.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 58.3% for GLM-4.7-Flash and 84.4% for Qwen3.6 Flash.
- GLM-4.7-Flash is cheaper at $0.06 / $0.40 per million input/output tokens, against $0.19 / $1.13 for Qwen3.6 Flash.
- Qwen3.6 Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 200K.
- GLM-4.7-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | GLM-4.7-Flash | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 38.4 | 38.4 |
| Rank | 175 | 176 |
| Context | 200K | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.06 | $0.19 |
| Output $/M | $0.40 | $1.13 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.0 (#133)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1383 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 326.4 |

## Reasoning

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 20.2 (#224)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: 28.4 (#90)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | 20% |
| SimpleBench | — | 35.2% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1356 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 18% |
| DTBench | — | 77.1% |
| LMCA | — | 31% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 143.26 |

## Math

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 34.4 (#159)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: 38.0 (#88)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 58.3% | 84.4% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 22.5% |
| LMArena Math | 1354 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 10.3% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 0% |

## Knowledge

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 35.4 (#177)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: 42.2 (#90)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 60.5% | 83.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 15.9% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1357 | — |

## Multilingual

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 46.8 (#152)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1331 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1403 | — |
| LMArena French | 1332 | — |
| LMArena German | 1336 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1284 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1333 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1351 | — |

## Instruction Following

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 70.3 (#162)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1327 | — |

## Long Context

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.9 (#143)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1345 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 47.7 (#206)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1351 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1297 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1125 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1342 | — |

## FAQ

### Is GLM-4.7-Flash better than Qwen3.6 Flash?

GLM-4.7-Flash and Qwen3.6 Flash score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.4 vs 38.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Which is cheaper, GLM-4.7-Flash or Qwen3.6 Flash?

GLM-4.7-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; Qwen3.6 Flash lists at $0.19 and $1.13.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.6 Flash does, with 1M tokens against 200K.

### How many benchmarks do GLM-4.7-Flash and Qwen3.6 Flash share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.7-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Flash has 13.