# GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3.5 Plus

> Qwen3.5 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 38.4 on the Noometry Index. GLM-4.7-Flash costs 6.2× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.5 Plus's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/glm-4-7-flash-vs-qwen3-5-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 4

## Summary

- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.7-Flash scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5 Plus in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.5 Plus leads 47.9 to 34.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 58.3% for GLM-4.7-Flash and 86.7% for Qwen3.5 Plus.
- GLM-4.7-Flash is cheaper at $0.06 / $0.40 per million input/output tokens, against $0.40 / $2.40 for Qwen3.5 Plus.
- Qwen3.5 Plus accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 200K.
- GLM-4.7-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | GLM-4.7-Flash | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 38.4 | 42.3 |
| Rank | 175 | 103 |
| Context | 200K | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.06 | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | $0.40 | $2.40 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.0 (#133)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1383 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 621.92 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- GLM-4.7-Flash: —
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 0.54 |

## Reasoning

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 20.2 (#224)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: 32.0 (#67)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | 22% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1356 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 17% |
| DTBench | — | 80.5% |
| LMCA | — | 36.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 146.79 |

## Math

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 34.4 (#159)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: 47.9 (#55)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 58.3% | 86.7% |
| LMArena Math | 1354 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 21% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 2.1% |

## Knowledge

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 35.4 (#177)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: 46.0 (#78)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 60.5% | 84.8% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | 10.7% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 25.4% |
| LMArena Expert | 1357 | — |

## Multilingual

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 46.8 (#152)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1331 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1403 | — |
| LMArena French | 1332 | — |
| LMArena German | 1336 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1284 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1333 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1351 | — |

## Instruction Following

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 70.3 (#162)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1327 | — |

## Long Context

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.9 (#143)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: 42.9 (#109)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| CL-bench | — | 19.8% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 12.4% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1345 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 47.7 (#206)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1351 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1297 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1125 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1342 | — |

## FAQ

### Is GLM-4.7-Flash better than Qwen3.5 Plus?

Qwen3.5 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 38.4 on the Noometry Index. GLM-4.7-Flash costs 6.2× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.5 Plus's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, GLM-4.7-Flash or Qwen3.5 Plus?

GLM-4.7-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; Qwen3.5 Plus lists at $0.40 and $2.40.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.5 Plus does, with 1M tokens against 200K.

### How many benchmarks do GLM-4.7-Flash and Qwen3.5 Plus share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.7-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Plus has 15.