# GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3 32B

> GLM-4.7-Flash and Qwen3 32B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.4 vs 38.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/glm-4-7-flash-vs-qwen3-32b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.7-Flash scores higher in 4 categories and Qwen3 32B in 4 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3 32B leads 53.1 to 47.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 58.3% for GLM-4.7-Flash and 66.9% for Qwen3 32B.
- GLM-4.7-Flash is cheaper at $0.06 / $0.40 per million input/output tokens, against $0.70 / $2.80 for Qwen3 32B.
- GLM-4.7-Flash accepts more context: 200K tokens versus 131K.

## Snapshot

| | GLM-4.7-Flash | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 38.4 | 38.8 |
| Rank | 175 | 166 |
| Context | 200K | 131K |
| Input $/M | $0.06 | $0.70 |
| Output $/M | $0.40 | $2.80 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.0 (#133)
- Qwen3 32B: 37.3 (#184)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1383 | 1358 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 40% |
| SciCode | — | 35.4% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- GLM-4.7-Flash: —
- Qwen3 32B: 32.3 (#58)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 48.7% |

## Reasoning

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 20.2 (#224)
- Qwen3 32B: 19.6 (#233)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | 5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1356 | 1335 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 54.9% |
| CritPt | — | 0.3% |
| DTBench | — | 67.5% |
| LMCA | — | 17.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 138.51 |

## Math

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 34.4 (#159)
- Qwen3 32B: 37.9 (#89)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 58.3% | 66.9% |
| LMArena Math | 1354 | 1399 |

## Knowledge

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 35.4 (#177)
- Qwen3 32B: 40.0 (#112)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 60.5% | 65.7% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | 5.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1357 | 1362 |

## Multilingual

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 46.8 (#152)
- Qwen3 32B: 45.8 (#162)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1331 | 1317 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1403 | 1357 |
| LMArena German | 1336 | 1341 |
| LMArena Russian | 1333 | 1311 |
| LMArena French | 1332 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1284 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1351 | — |

## Instruction Following

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 70.3 (#162)
- Qwen3 32B: 69.1 (#174)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1327 | 1305 |

## Long Context

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.9 (#143)
- Qwen3 32B: 43.7 (#83)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1345 | 1327 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 74.2% |

## Writing & Preference

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 47.7 (#206)
- Qwen3 32B: 53.1 (#158)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1351 | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1297 | 1297 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1342 | 1331 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1125 | — |

## FAQ

### Is GLM-4.7-Flash better than Qwen3 32B?

GLM-4.7-Flash and Qwen3 32B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.4 vs 38.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Which is cheaper, GLM-4.7-Flash or Qwen3 32B?

GLM-4.7-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; Qwen3 32B lists at $0.70 and $2.80.

### Is GLM-4.7-Flash or Qwen3 32B better for coding?

GLM-4.7-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 37.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

GLM-4.7-Flash does, with 200K tokens against 131K.

### How many benchmarks do GLM-4.7-Flash and Qwen3 32B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.7-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 32B has 26.