# GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127

> GLM-4.7-Flash and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.8 vs 38.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/glm-4-7-flash-vs-qwen2-5-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.7-Flash scores higher in 5 categories and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 in 3 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads 25.9 to 20.9.
- GLM-4.7-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | GLM-4.7-Flash | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 38.8 | 38.8 |
| Rank | 180 | 181 |
| Context | 200K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.06 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.40 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.6 (#135)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1383 | 1314 |

## Reasoning

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 20.9 (#229)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1356 | 1299 |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |

## Math

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 36.1 (#173)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1355 | 1298 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 58.3% | — |

## Knowledge

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 35.5 (#184)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1357 | 1289 |
| GPQA Diamond | 60.5% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 46.5 (#158)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1330 | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1403 | 1314 |
| LMArena German | 1337 | 1231 |
| LMArena Russian | 1332 | 1271 |
| LMArena French | 1332 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1207 |
| LMArena Korean | 1283 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1350 | — |

## Instruction Following

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 70.1 (#167)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1327 | 1275 |

## Long Context

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.9 (#148)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1345 | 1292 |

## Writing & Preference

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 47.4 (#210)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1351 | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1297 | 1262 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1342 | 1299 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1125 | — |

## FAQ

### Is GLM-4.7-Flash better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?

GLM-4.7-Flash and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.8 vs 38.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is GLM-4.7-Flash or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?

GLM-4.7-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.6 versus 38.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do GLM-4.7-Flash and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.7-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.