# GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen Plus

> GLM-4.7-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.4 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/glm-4-7-flash-vs-qwen-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.7-Flash scores higher in 6 categories and Qwen Plus in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where GLM-4.7-Flash leads 34.4 to 22.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 58.3% for GLM-4.7-Flash and 17.8% for Qwen Plus.
- GLM-4.7-Flash is cheaper at $0.06 / $0.40 per million input/output tokens, against $0.40 / $1.20 for Qwen Plus.
- Qwen Plus accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 200K.
- GLM-4.7-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | GLM-4.7-Flash | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 38.4 | 36.7 |
| Rank | 175 | 204 |
| Context | 200K | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.06 | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | $0.40 | $1.20 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.0 (#133)
- Qwen Plus: 38.3 (#163)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1383 | 1328 |

## Reasoning

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 20.2 (#224)
- Qwen Plus: 27.6 (#101)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1356 | 1317 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 63.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| DTBench | — | 81.1% |
| LMCA | — | 24% |

## Math

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 34.4 (#159)
- Qwen Plus: 22.0 (#266)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 58.3% | 17.8% |
| LMArena Math | 1354 | 1326 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 65.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1.7% |

## Knowledge

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 35.4 (#177)
- Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#245)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 60.5% | 48.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1357 | 1328 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 46.8 (#152)
- Qwen Plus: 45.3 (#170)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1331 | 1310 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1403 | 1347 |
| LMArena Russian | 1333 | 1323 |
| LMArena French | 1332 | — |
| LMArena German | 1336 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1251 |
| LMArena Korean | 1284 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1351 | — |

## Instruction Following

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 70.3 (#162)
- Qwen Plus: 69.0 (#176)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1327 | 1303 |

## Long Context

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.9 (#143)
- Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#153)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1345 | 1325 |

## Writing & Preference

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 47.7 (#206)
- Qwen Plus: 52.4 (#171)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1351 | 1326 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1297 | 1293 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1342 | 1336 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1125 | — |

## FAQ

### Is GLM-4.7-Flash better than Qwen Plus?

GLM-4.7-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.4 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, GLM-4.7-Flash or Qwen Plus?

GLM-4.7-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; Qwen Plus lists at $0.40 and $1.20.

### Is GLM-4.7-Flash or Qwen Plus better for coding?

GLM-4.7-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 38.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen Plus does, with 1M tokens against 200K.

### How many benchmarks do GLM-4.7-Flash and Qwen Plus share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.7-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Plus has 20.