# GLM-4.7-Flash vs Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct

> GLM-4.7-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/glm-4-7-flash-vs-phi-3-mini-128k-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 16

## Summary

- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.7-Flash scores higher in 8 categories and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where GLM-4.7-Flash leads 46.5 to 25.2.

## Snapshot

| | GLM-4.7-Flash | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 38.8 | 29.7 |
| Rank | 180 | 305 |
| Context | 200K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.06 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.40 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.6 (#135)
- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 28.8 (#312)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1383 | 1039 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 29.6% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 40.6% |

## Reasoning

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 20.9 (#229)
- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 19.6 (#256)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1356 | 1028 |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |

## Math

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 36.1 (#173)
- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 31.6 (#222)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1355 | 1089 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 58.3% | — |

## Knowledge

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 35.5 (#184)
- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 26.8 (#254)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1357 | 984 |
| GPQA Diamond | 60.5% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 46.5 (#158)
- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 25.2 (#285)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1330 | 1000 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1403 | 1016 |
| LMArena French | 1332 | 1039 |
| LMArena German | 1337 | 1006 |
| LMArena Korean | 1283 | 856 |
| LMArena Russian | 1332 | 1004 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1350 | 1059 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 899 |

## Instruction Following

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 70.1 (#167)
- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 51.8 (#294)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1327 | 1023 |

## Long Context

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.9 (#148)
- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 30.4 (#289)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1345 | 996 |

## Writing & Preference

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 47.4 (#210)
- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 27.1 (#301)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1351 | 1050 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1297 | 1024 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1342 | 989 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1125 | — |

## FAQ

### Is GLM-4.7-Flash better than Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct?

GLM-4.7-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is GLM-4.7-Flash or Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct better for coding?

GLM-4.7-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.6 versus 28.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do GLM-4.7-Flash and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.7-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has 19.