# GLM-4.7-Flash vs phi-3-medium 14B

> GLM-4.7-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/glm-4-7-flash-vs-phi-3-medium-14b
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. GLM-4.7-Flash scores higher in 3 categories and phi-3-medium 14B in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where GLM-4.7-Flash leads 35.5 to 9.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 60.5% for GLM-4.7-Flash and 27.6% for phi-3-medium 14B.

## Snapshot

| | GLM-4.7-Flash | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 38.8 | 29.7 |
| Rank | 180 | 306 |
| Context | 200K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.06 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.40 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.6 (#135)
- phi-3-medium 14B: 36.8 (#201)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1383 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 48.7% |

## Reasoning

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 20.9 (#229)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1356 | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 55.8% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 81.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 121.23 |
| HellaSwag | — | 82.4% |
| WinoGrande | — | 81.5% |

## Math

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 36.1 (#173)
- phi-3-medium 14B: 27.3 (#250)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 58.3% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1355 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 17.6% |

## Knowledge

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 35.5 (#184)
- phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#306)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 60.5% | 27.6% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1357 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 91.6% |
| MMLU | — | 78% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 87.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 73.9% |

## Multilingual

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 46.5 (#158)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1330 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1403 | — |
| LMArena French | 1332 | — |
| LMArena German | 1337 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1283 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1332 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1350 | — |

## Instruction Following

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 70.1 (#167)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1327 | — |

## Long Context

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.9 (#148)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1345 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 47.4 (#210)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1351 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1297 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1125 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1342 | — |

## FAQ

### Is GLM-4.7-Flash better than phi-3-medium 14B?

GLM-4.7-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is GLM-4.7-Flash or phi-3-medium 14B better for coding?

GLM-4.7-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.6 versus 36.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do GLM-4.7-Flash and phi-3-medium 14B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. GLM-4.7-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and phi-3-medium 14B has 13.