# GLM-4.7-Flash vs Nova 2.0 Pro Preview

> GLM-4.7-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/glm-4-7-flash-vs-nova-2-0-pro-preview
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- GLM-4.7-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | GLM-4.7-Flash | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Amazon |
| Noometry Index | 38.8 | 33.4 |
| Rank | 180 | 244 |
| Context | 200K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.06 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.40 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.6 (#135)
- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 40.8 (#133)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 42.7% |
| LMArena Coding | 1383 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- GLM-4.7-Flash: —
- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 21.9 (#136)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| GDP.pdf | — | 2% |

## Reasoning

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 20.9 (#229)
- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 22.4 (#194)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1356 | — |

## Math

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 36.1 (#173)
- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 58.3% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1355 | — |

## Knowledge

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 35.5 (#184)
- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 60.5% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1357 | — |

## Multilingual

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 46.5 (#158)
- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1330 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1403 | — |
| LMArena French | 1332 | — |
| LMArena German | 1337 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1283 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1332 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1350 | — |

## Instruction Following

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 70.1 (#167)
- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1327 | — |

## Long Context

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.9 (#148)
- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1345 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 47.4 (#210)
- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1351 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1297 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1125 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1342 | — |

## FAQ

### Is GLM-4.7-Flash better than Nova 2.0 Pro Preview?

GLM-4.7-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is GLM-4.7-Flash or Nova 2.0 Pro Preview better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (40.6 vs 40.8); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do GLM-4.7-Flash and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.7-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview has 3.