# GLM-4.7-Flash vs Nemotron 4 340b Instruct

> GLM-4.7-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.4 to 35.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/glm-4-7-flash-vs-nemotron-4-340b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 16

## Summary

- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.7-Flash scores higher in 7 categories and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where GLM-4.7-Flash leads 46.8 to 38.0.

## Snapshot

| | GLM-4.7-Flash | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | NVIDIA |
| Noometry Index | 38.4 | 35.3 |
| Rank | 175 | 218 |
| Context | 200K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.06 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.40 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.0 (#133)
- Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 34.6 (#223)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1383 | 1209 |

## Reasoning

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 20.2 (#224)
- Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 22.4 (#180)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1356 | 1202 |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |

## Math

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 34.4 (#159)
- Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 31.7 (#193)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1354 | 1216 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 58.3% | — |

## Knowledge

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 35.4 (#177)
- Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 31.4 (#212)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1357 | 1171 |
| GPQA Diamond | 60.5% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 46.8 (#152)
- Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 38.0 (#228)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1331 | 1206 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1403 | 1214 |
| LMArena French | 1332 | 1196 |
| LMArena German | 1336 | 1192 |
| LMArena Korean | 1284 | 1148 |
| LMArena Russian | 1333 | 1219 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1351 | 1195 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1128 |

## Instruction Following

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 70.3 (#162)
- Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 63.3 (#227)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1327 | 1203 |

## Long Context

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.9 (#143)
- Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.1 (#216)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1345 | 1225 |

## Writing & Preference

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 47.7 (#206)
- Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 42.9 (#229)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1351 | 1225 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1297 | 1203 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1342 | 1214 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1125 | — |

## FAQ

### Is GLM-4.7-Flash better than Nemotron 4 340b Instruct?

GLM-4.7-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.4 to 35.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is GLM-4.7-Flash or Nemotron 4 340b Instruct better for coding?

GLM-4.7-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 34.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do GLM-4.7-Flash and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.7-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct has 17.