# GLM-4.7-Flash vs Mistral

> GLM-4.7-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.4 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/glm-4-7-flash-vs-mistral
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 16

## Summary

- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.7-Flash scores higher in 7 categories and Mistral in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where GLM-4.7-Flash leads 35.4 to 16.3.
- GLM-4.7-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | GLM-4.7-Flash | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 38.4 | 29.4 |
| Rank | 175 | 297 |
| Context | 200K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.06 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.40 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.0 (#133)
- Mistral: 33.2 (#249)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1383 | 1162 |

## Reasoning

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 20.2 (#224)
- Mistral: 21.3 (#199)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1356 | 1149 |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |

## Math

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 34.4 (#159)
- Mistral: 20.5 (#275)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1354 | 1180 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 58.3% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 7.2% |

## Knowledge

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 35.4 (#177)
- Mistral: 16.3 (#283)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1357 | 1125 |
| GPQA Diamond | 60.5% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 27.7% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 30.3% |

## Multilingual

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 46.8 (#152)
- Mistral: 33.0 (#249)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1331 | 1129 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1403 | 1109 |
| LMArena French | 1332 | 1179 |
| LMArena German | 1336 | 1155 |
| LMArena Korean | 1284 | 1032 |
| LMArena Russian | 1333 | 1168 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1351 | 1143 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1012 |

## Instruction Following

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 70.3 (#162)
- Mistral: 52.9 (#283)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1327 | 1152 |
| IFEval | — | 56.8% |

## Long Context

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.9 (#143)
- Mistral: 35.0 (#240)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1345 | 1154 |

## Writing & Preference

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 47.7 (#206)
- Mistral: 37.2 (#255)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1351 | 1165 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1297 | 1158 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1342 | 1147 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1125 | — |
| WildBench | — | 66% |

## FAQ

### Is GLM-4.7-Flash better than Mistral?

GLM-4.7-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.4 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is GLM-4.7-Flash or Mistral better for coding?

GLM-4.7-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 33.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do GLM-4.7-Flash and Mistral share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.7-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and Mistral has 22.