# GLM-4.7-Flash vs Mistral

> GLM-4.7-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/glm-4-7-flash-vs-mistral
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 16

## Summary

- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.7-Flash scores higher in 7 categories and Mistral in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where GLM-4.7-Flash leads 35.5 to 16.6.
- GLM-4.7-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | GLM-4.7-Flash | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 38.8 | 29.9 |
| Rank | 180 | 303 |
| Context | 200K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.06 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.40 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.6 (#135)
- Mistral: 33.8 (#250)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1383 | 1162 |

## Reasoning

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 20.9 (#229)
- Mistral: 22.2 (#200)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1356 | 1149 |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |

## Math

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 36.1 (#173)
- Mistral: 22.3 (#278)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1355 | 1180 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 58.3% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 7.2% |

## Knowledge

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 35.5 (#184)
- Mistral: 16.6 (#288)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1357 | 1125 |
| GPQA Diamond | 60.5% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 27.7% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 30.3% |

## Multilingual

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 46.5 (#158)
- Mistral: 32.8 (#254)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1330 | 1129 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1403 | 1109 |
| LMArena French | 1332 | 1180 |
| LMArena German | 1337 | 1155 |
| LMArena Korean | 1283 | 1032 |
| LMArena Russian | 1332 | 1168 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1350 | 1143 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1013 |

## Instruction Following

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 70.1 (#167)
- Mistral: 52.6 (#288)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1327 | 1152 |
| IFEval | — | 56.8% |

## Long Context

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.9 (#148)
- Mistral: 35.0 (#245)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1345 | 1153 |

## Writing & Preference

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 47.4 (#210)
- Mistral: 37.0 (#260)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1351 | 1165 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1297 | 1158 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1342 | 1147 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1125 | — |
| WildBench | — | 66% |

## FAQ

### Is GLM-4.7-Flash better than Mistral?

GLM-4.7-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is GLM-4.7-Flash or Mistral better for coding?

GLM-4.7-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.6 versus 33.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do GLM-4.7-Flash and Mistral share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.7-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and Mistral has 22.