# GLM-4.7-Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

> MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.7 to 38.4 on the Noometry Index. GLM-4.7-Flash costs 3.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2.6-Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/glm-4-7-flash-vs-mimo-v2-6-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.7-Flash scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Pro in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 66.9 to 47.7.
- GLM-4.7-Flash is cheaper at $0.06 / $0.40 per million input/output tokens, against $0.43 / $0.87 for MiMo-V2.6-Pro.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 200K.

## Snapshot

| | GLM-4.7-Flash | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 38.4 | 46.7 |
| Rank | 175 | 55 |
| Context | 200K | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | $0.06 | $0.43 |
| Output $/M | $0.40 | $0.87 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.0 (#133)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 53.2 (#27)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1383 | 1538 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1618 |

## Reasoning

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 20.2 (#224)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 30.4 (#76)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1356 | 1511 |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |

## Math

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 34.4 (#159)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.9 (#91)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1354 | 1497 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 58.3% | — |

## Knowledge

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 35.4 (#177)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.0 (#85)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1357 | 1548 |
| GPQA Diamond | 60.5% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |

## Multimodal

- GLM-4.7-Flash: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.2 (#40)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1265 |

## Multilingual

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 46.8 (#152)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 57.0 (#15)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1331 | 1474 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1403 | 1532 |
| LMArena Russian | 1333 | 1481 |
| LMArena French | 1332 | — |
| LMArena German | 1336 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1284 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1351 | — |

## Instruction Following

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 70.3 (#162)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#10)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1327 | 1490 |

## Long Context

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.9 (#143)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#26)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1345 | 1500 |

## Writing & Preference

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 47.7 (#206)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.9 (#32)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1351 | 1491 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1297 | 1465 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1342 | 1463 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1125 | — |

## FAQ

### Is GLM-4.7-Flash better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.7 to 38.4 on the Noometry Index. GLM-4.7-Flash costs 3.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2.6-Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, GLM-4.7-Flash or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

GLM-4.7-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.6-Pro lists at $0.43 and $0.87.

### Is GLM-4.7-Flash or MiMo-V2.6-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.2 versus 40.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 200K.

### How many benchmarks do GLM-4.7-Flash and MiMo-V2.6-Pro share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.7-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 14.