# GLM-4.7-Flash vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct

> GLM-4.7-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/glm-4-7-flash-vs-llama-3-1-nemotron-51b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.7-Flash scores higher in 7 categories and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where GLM-4.7-Flash leads 46.5 to 36.1.

## Snapshot

| | GLM-4.7-Flash | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | NVIDIA |
| Noometry Index | 38.8 | 35.9 |
| Rank | 180 | 222 |
| Context | 200K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.06 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.40 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.6 (#135)
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 35.6 (#222)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1383 | 1223 |

## Reasoning

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 20.9 (#229)
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 23.5 (#177)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1356 | 1203 |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |

## Math

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 36.1 (#173)
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 34.6 (#193)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1355 | 1230 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 58.3% | — |

## Knowledge

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 35.5 (#184)
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 31.9 (#218)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1357 | 1167 |
| GPQA Diamond | 60.5% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 46.5 (#158)
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 36.1 (#241)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1330 | 1181 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1403 | 1180 |
| LMArena Russian | 1332 | 1187 |
| LMArena French | 1332 | — |
| LMArena German | 1337 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1283 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1350 | — |

## Instruction Following

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 70.1 (#167)
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 62.9 (#233)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1327 | 1201 |

## Long Context

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.9 (#148)
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 36.5 (#230)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1345 | 1205 |

## Writing & Preference

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 47.4 (#210)
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 43.4 (#229)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1351 | 1228 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1297 | 1213 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1342 | 1227 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1125 | — |

## FAQ

### Is GLM-4.7-Flash better than Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct?

GLM-4.7-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is GLM-4.7-Flash or Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct better for coding?

GLM-4.7-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.6 versus 35.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do GLM-4.7-Flash and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.7-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct has 12.