# GLM-4.7-Flash vs Laguna M.1

> GLM-4.7-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.4 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/glm-4-7-flash-vs-laguna-m-1
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where GLM-4.7-Flash leads 34.4 to 20.3.
- Laguna M.1 accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 200K.

## Snapshot

| | GLM-4.7-Flash | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Poolside |
| Noometry Index | 38.4 | 31.9 |
| Rank | 175 | 252 |
| Context | 200K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $0.06 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.40 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.0 (#133)
- Laguna M.1: 36.4 (#195)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1348 |
| LMArena Coding | 1383 | — |

## Reasoning

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 20.2 (#224)
- Laguna M.1: 21.9 (#187)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1356 | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 15.6% |

## Math

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 34.4 (#159)
- Laguna M.1: 20.3 (#276)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 58.3% | — |
| ProofBench | — | 0% |
| LMArena Math | 1354 | — |

## Knowledge

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 35.4 (#177)
- Laguna M.1: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 60.5% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1357 | — |

## Multilingual

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 46.8 (#152)
- Laguna M.1: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1331 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1403 | — |
| LMArena French | 1332 | — |
| LMArena German | 1336 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1284 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1333 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1351 | — |

## Instruction Following

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 70.3 (#162)
- Laguna M.1: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1327 | — |

## Long Context

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.9 (#143)
- Laguna M.1: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1345 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 47.7 (#206)
- Laguna M.1: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1351 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1297 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1125 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1342 | — |

## FAQ

### Is GLM-4.7-Flash better than Laguna M.1?

GLM-4.7-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.4 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is GLM-4.7-Flash or Laguna M.1 better for coding?

GLM-4.7-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 36.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Laguna M.1 does, with 262K tokens against 200K.

### How many benchmarks do GLM-4.7-Flash and Laguna M.1 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.7-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and Laguna M.1 has 3.