# GLM-4.7-Flash vs Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo

> Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/glm-4-7-flash-vs-kimi-k2-thinking-turbo
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 19

## Summary

- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.7-Flash scores higher in 1 category and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads 50.9 to 35.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 58.3% for GLM-4.7-Flash and 83.1% for Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo.

## Snapshot

| | GLM-4.7-Flash | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Moonshot AI |
| Noometry Index | 38.8 | 45.8 |
| Rank | 180 | 70 |
| Context | 200K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.06 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.40 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.6 (#135)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 38.4 (#178)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1383 | 1454 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1322 |

## Reasoning

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 20.9 (#229)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 32.5 (#75)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | 20% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1356 | 1428 |

## Math

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 36.1 (#173)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 47.4 (#68)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 58.3% | 83.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1355 | 1429 |

## Knowledge

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 35.5 (#184)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 50.9 (#69)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 60.5% | 84.2% |
| LMArena Expert | 1357 | 1439 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 46.5 (#158)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 51.4 (#109)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1330 | 1398 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1403 | 1456 |
| LMArena French | 1332 | 1425 |
| LMArena German | 1337 | 1390 |
| LMArena Korean | 1283 | 1330 |
| LMArena Russian | 1332 | 1391 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1350 | 1406 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1357 |

## Instruction Following

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 70.1 (#167)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 74.0 (#109)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1327 | 1403 |

## Long Context

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.9 (#148)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 43.2 (#102)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1345 | 1415 |

## Writing & Preference

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 47.4 (#210)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 60.0 (#104)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1351 | 1415 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1297 | 1374 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1342 | 1414 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1125 | — |

## FAQ

### Is GLM-4.7-Flash better than Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo?

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is GLM-4.7-Flash or Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo better for coding?

GLM-4.7-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.6 versus 38.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do GLM-4.7-Flash and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.7-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has 21.