# GLM-4.7-Flash vs Kimi K2.5 Instant

> Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 38.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/glm-4-7-flash-vs-kimi-k2-5-instant
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 16

## Summary

- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.7-Flash scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K2.5 Instant in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Kimi K2.5 Instant leads 60.8 to 47.7.

## Snapshot

| | GLM-4.7-Flash | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Moonshot AI |
| Noometry Index | 38.4 | 42.9 |
| Rank | 175 | 92 |
| Context | 200K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.06 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.40 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.0 (#133)
- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 42.3 (#95)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1383 | 1483 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1404 |

## Reasoning

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 20.2 (#224)
- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 28.5 (#88)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1356 | 1443 |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |

## Math

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 34.4 (#159)
- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 36.6 (#105)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1354 | 1443 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 58.3% | — |

## Knowledge

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 35.4 (#177)
- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 39.5 (#121)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1357 | 1438 |
| GPQA Diamond | 60.5% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |

## Multimodal

- GLM-4.7-Flash: —
- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 39.5 (#47)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1254 |

## Multilingual

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 46.8 (#152)
- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 52.2 (#89)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1331 | 1406 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1403 | 1450 |
| LMArena French | 1332 | 1403 |
| LMArena German | 1336 | 1413 |
| LMArena Korean | 1284 | 1378 |
| LMArena Russian | 1333 | 1404 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1351 | 1448 |

## Instruction Following

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 70.3 (#162)
- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 75.5 (#61)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1327 | 1430 |

## Long Context

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.9 (#143)
- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 43.8 (#82)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1345 | 1435 |

## Writing & Preference

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 47.7 (#206)
- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 60.8 (#91)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1351 | 1420 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1297 | 1379 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1342 | 1427 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1125 | — |

## FAQ

### Is GLM-4.7-Flash better than Kimi K2.5 Instant?

Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 38.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is GLM-4.7-Flash or Kimi K2.5 Instant better for coding?

Kimi K2.5 Instant scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.3 versus 40.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do GLM-4.7-Flash and Kimi K2.5 Instant share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.7-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.5 Instant has 18.