# GLM-4.7-Flash vs Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10

> GLM-4.7-Flash and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.4 vs 38.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/glm-4-7-flash-vs-hunyuan-large
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.7-Flash scores higher in 6 categories and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 in 2 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where GLM-4.7-Flash leads 46.8 to 42.1.
- GLM-4.7-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | GLM-4.7-Flash | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 38.4 | 38.0 |
| Rank | 175 | 183 |
| Context | 200K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.06 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.40 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.0 (#133)
- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 37.6 (#177)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1383 | 1307 |

## Reasoning

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 20.2 (#224)
- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 24.5 (#147)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1356 | 1286 |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |

## Math

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 34.4 (#159)
- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 33.1 (#178)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1354 | 1281 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 58.3% | — |

## Knowledge

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 35.4 (#177)
- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 34.5 (#188)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1357 | 1276 |
| GPQA Diamond | 60.5% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 46.8 (#152)
- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 42.1 (#195)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1331 | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1403 | 1346 |
| LMArena Russian | 1333 | 1266 |
| LMArena French | 1332 | — |
| LMArena German | 1336 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1284 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1351 | — |

## Instruction Following

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 70.3 (#162)
- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 67.6 (#192)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1327 | 1277 |

## Long Context

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.9 (#143)
- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 40.8 (#144)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1345 | 1342 |

## Writing & Preference

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 47.7 (#206)
- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 48.9 (#191)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1351 | 1288 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1297 | 1264 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1342 | 1284 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1125 | — |

## FAQ

### Is GLM-4.7-Flash better than Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10?

GLM-4.7-Flash and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.4 vs 38.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is GLM-4.7-Flash or Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 better for coding?

GLM-4.7-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 37.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do GLM-4.7-Flash and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.7-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has 12.