# GLM-4.7-Flash vs Grok 3

> Grok 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/glm-4-7-flash-vs-grok-3
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 20

## Summary

- They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.7-Flash scores higher in 2 categories and Grok 3 in 6 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Grok 3 leads 46.2 to 35.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 60.5% for GLM-4.7-Flash and 75.8% for Grok 3.
- GLM-4.7-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | GLM-4.7-Flash | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 38.8 | 39.9 |
| Rank | 180 | 157 |
| Context | 200K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.06 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.40 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.6 (#135)
- Grok 3: 41.9 (#115)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1383 | 1432 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 53.3% |
| WeirdML | — | 37.2% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- GLM-4.7-Flash: —
- Grok 3: 30.5 (#76)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | — | 29.5% |

## Reasoning

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 20.9 (#229)
- Grok 3: 13.7 (#333)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1356 | 1434 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0% |
| SimpleBench | — | 36.1% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 61.3% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 5.5% |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 138.33 |

## Math

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 36.1 (#173)
- Grok 3: 38.0 (#145)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 58.3% | 55.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1355 | 1391 |
| Omni-MATH | — | 46.4% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 88.7% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 3.8% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 0% |

## Knowledge

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 35.5 (#184)
- Grok 3: 46.2 (#82)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 60.5% | 75.8% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | 5.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1357 | 1421 |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 78.8% |
| Confabulations | — | 14.2% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 65% |

## Multilingual

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 46.5 (#158)
- Grok 3: 52.3 (#87)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1330 | 1410 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1403 | 1448 |
| LMArena French | 1332 | 1460 |
| LMArena German | 1337 | 1431 |
| LMArena Korean | 1283 | 1373 |
| LMArena Russian | 1332 | 1416 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1350 | 1417 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1387 |

## Instruction Following

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 70.1 (#167)
- Grok 3: 75.0 (#73)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1327 | 1409 |
| IFEval | — | 88.4% |

## Long Context

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.9 (#148)
- Grok 3: 38.7 (#192)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1345 | 1439 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 58.3% |

## Writing & Preference

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 47.4 (#210)
- Grok 3: 55.8 (#141)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1351 | 1426 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1297 | 1414 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1125 | 1186 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1342 | 1425 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 76.4% |
| WildBench | — | 84.9% |

## FAQ

### Is GLM-4.7-Flash better than Grok 3?

Grok 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is GLM-4.7-Flash or Grok 3 better for coding?

Grok 3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.9 versus 40.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do GLM-4.7-Flash and Grok 3 share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.7-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and Grok 3 has 40.