# GLM-4.7-Flash vs Grok-3 mini

> Grok-3 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/glm-4-7-flash-vs-grok-3-mini
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 18

## Summary

- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.7-Flash scores higher in 1 category and Grok-3 mini in 7 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Grok-3 mini leads 46.4 to 35.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 58.3% for GLM-4.7-Flash and 77.8% for Grok-3 mini.
- GLM-4.7-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | GLM-4.7-Flash | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 38.8 | 41.2 |
| Rank | 180 | 141 |
| Context | 200K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.06 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.40 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.6 (#135)
- Grok-3 mini: 40.8 (#131)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1383 | 1379 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 49.3% |
| WeirdML | — | 42.6% |

## Reasoning

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 20.9 (#229)
- Grok-3 mini: 13.6 (#334)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1356 | 1375 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0.4% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 61.3% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 16.5% |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 140.35 |

## Math

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 36.1 (#173)
- Grok-3 mini: 42.1 (#85)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 58.3% | 77.8% |
| LMArena Math | 1355 | 1386 |
| Omni-MATH | — | 31.8% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 90.9% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 5.9% |

## Knowledge

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 35.5 (#184)
- Grok-3 mini: 46.4 (#81)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 60.5% | 76.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1357 | 1395 |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 79.9% |
| Confabulations | — | 10.8% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 67.5% |

## Multilingual

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 46.5 (#158)
- Grok-3 mini: 48.1 (#145)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1330 | 1352 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1403 | 1387 |
| LMArena French | 1332 | 1357 |
| LMArena German | 1337 | 1349 |
| LMArena Korean | 1283 | 1335 |
| LMArena Russian | 1332 | 1353 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1350 | 1381 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1342 |

## Instruction Following

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 70.1 (#167)
- Grok-3 mini: 78.5 (#9)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1327 | 1357 |
| IFEval | — | 95.1% |

## Long Context

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.9 (#148)
- Grok-3 mini: 41.0 (#147)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1345 | 1372 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |

## Writing & Preference

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 47.4 (#210)
- Grok-3 mini: 52.5 (#169)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1351 | 1370 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1297 | 1342 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1342 | 1355 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 73.5% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1125 | — |
| WildBench | — | 65.1% |

## FAQ

### Is GLM-4.7-Flash better than Grok-3 mini?

Grok-3 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is GLM-4.7-Flash or Grok-3 mini better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (40.6 vs 40.8); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do GLM-4.7-Flash and Grok-3 mini share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.7-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and Grok-3 mini has 35.