# GLM-4.7-Flash vs Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13

> GLM-4.7-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/glm-4-7-flash-vs-grok-2-mini
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 16

## Summary

- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.7-Flash scores higher in 7 categories and Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 in 1 category; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where GLM-4.7-Flash leads 46.5 to 41.4.
- GLM-4.7-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | GLM-4.7-Flash | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 38.8 | 37.7 |
| Rank | 180 | 198 |
| Context | 200K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.06 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.40 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.6 (#135)
- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 37.0 (#199)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1383 | 1269 |

## Reasoning

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 20.9 (#229)
- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 24.8 (#159)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1356 | 1255 |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |

## Math

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 36.1 (#173)
- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 35.4 (#185)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1355 | 1265 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 58.3% | — |

## Knowledge

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 35.5 (#184)
- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 33.9 (#200)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1357 | 1238 |
| GPQA Diamond | 60.5% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 46.5 (#158)
- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 41.4 (#208)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1330 | 1257 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1403 | 1262 |
| LMArena French | 1332 | 1286 |
| LMArena German | 1337 | 1273 |
| LMArena Korean | 1283 | 1195 |
| LMArena Russian | 1332 | 1261 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1350 | 1279 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1213 |

## Instruction Following

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 70.1 (#167)
- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 65.5 (#220)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1327 | 1245 |

## Long Context

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.9 (#148)
- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 38.4 (#196)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1345 | 1266 |

## Writing & Preference

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 47.4 (#210)
- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 47.3 (#211)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1351 | 1281 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1297 | 1242 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1342 | 1265 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1125 | — |

## FAQ

### Is GLM-4.7-Flash better than Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13?

GLM-4.7-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is GLM-4.7-Flash or Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 better for coding?

GLM-4.7-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.6 versus 37.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do GLM-4.7-Flash and Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.7-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 has 17.