# GLM-4.7-Flash vs Granite 4.2 3b

> GLM-4.7-Flash and Granite 4.2 3b score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.8 vs 39.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/glm-4-7-flash-vs-granite-4-2-3b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.7-Flash scores higher in 5 categories and Granite 4.2 3b in 2 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Granite 4.2 3b leads 26.0 to 20.9.

## Snapshot

| | GLM-4.7-Flash | Granite 4.2 3b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | IBM |
| Noometry Index | 38.8 | 39.4 |
| Rank | 180 | 169 |
| Context | 200K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.06 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.40 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.6 (#135)
- Granite 4.2 3b: 40.0 (#151)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Granite 4.2 3b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1383 | 1361 |

## Reasoning

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 20.9 (#229)
- Granite 4.2 3b: 26.0 (#138)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Granite 4.2 3b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1356 | 1306 |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |

## Math

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 36.1 (#173)
- Granite 4.2 3b: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Granite 4.2 3b |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 58.3% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1355 | — |

## Knowledge

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 35.5 (#184)
- Granite 4.2 3b: 36.3 (#171)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Granite 4.2 3b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1357 | 1315 |
| GPQA Diamond | 60.5% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 46.5 (#158)
- Granite 4.2 3b: 42.1 (#198)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Granite 4.2 3b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1330 | 1268 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1403 | 1269 |
| LMArena Russian | 1332 | 1249 |
| LMArena French | 1332 | — |
| LMArena German | 1337 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1283 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1350 | — |

## Instruction Following

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 70.1 (#167)
- Granite 4.2 3b: 67.1 (#200)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Granite 4.2 3b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1327 | 1273 |

## Long Context

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.9 (#148)
- Granite 4.2 3b: 39.2 (#185)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Granite 4.2 3b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1345 | 1291 |

## Writing & Preference

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 47.4 (#210)
- Granite 4.2 3b: 47.2 (#212)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Granite 4.2 3b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1351 | 1293 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1297 | 1205 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1342 | 1290 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1125 | — |

## FAQ

### Is GLM-4.7-Flash better than Granite 4.2 3b?

GLM-4.7-Flash and Granite 4.2 3b score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.8 vs 39.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is GLM-4.7-Flash or Granite 4.2 3b better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (40.6 vs 40.0); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do GLM-4.7-Flash and Granite 4.2 3b share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.7-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.2 3b has 11.