# GLM-4.7-Flash vs Granite 4.0 Micro

> GLM-4.7-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.4 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index. Granite 4.0 Micro costs 3.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GLM-4.7-Flash's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/glm-4-7-flash-vs-granite-4-0-micro
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 3

## Summary

- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.7-Flash scores higher in 5 categories and Granite 4.0 Micro in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where GLM-4.7-Flash leads 35.4 to 9.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 58.3% for GLM-4.7-Flash and 2.8% for Granite 4.0 Micro.
- Granite 4.0 Micro is cheaper at $0.017 / $0.11 per million input/output tokens, against $0.06 / $0.40 for GLM-4.7-Flash.
- GLM-4.7-Flash accepts more context: 200K tokens versus 131K.

## Snapshot

| | GLM-4.7-Flash | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | IBM |
| Noometry Index | 38.4 | 28.8 |
| Rank | 175 | 312 |
| Context | 200K | 131K |
| Input $/M | $0.06 | $0.017 |
| Output $/M | $0.40 | $0.11 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.0 (#133)
- Granite 4.0 Micro: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1383 | — |

## Reasoning

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 20.2 (#224)
- Granite 4.0 Micro: 18.5 (#261)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1356 | — |

## Math

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 34.4 (#159)
- Granite 4.0 Micro: 11.2 (#301)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 58.3% | 2.8% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 20.9% |
| LMArena Math | 1354 | — |

## Knowledge

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 35.4 (#177)
- Granite 4.0 Micro: 9.9 (#299)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 60.5% | 28.3% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 39.5% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 30.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1357 | — |

## Multilingual

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 46.8 (#152)
- Granite 4.0 Micro: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1331 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1403 | — |
| LMArena French | 1332 | — |
| LMArena German | 1336 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1284 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1333 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1351 | — |

## Instruction Following

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 70.3 (#162)
- Granite 4.0 Micro: 70.0 (#164)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | — | 84.9% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1327 | — |

## Long Context

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.9 (#143)
- Granite 4.0 Micro: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1345 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- GLM-4.7-Flash: 47.7 (#206)
- Granite 4.0 Micro: 46.7 (#212)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1351 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1297 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1125 | — |
| WildBench | — | 67% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1342 | — |

## FAQ

### Is GLM-4.7-Flash better than Granite 4.0 Micro?

GLM-4.7-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.4 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index. Granite 4.0 Micro costs 3.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GLM-4.7-Flash's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, GLM-4.7-Flash or Granite 4.0 Micro?

Granite 4.0 Micro is cheaper. It lists at $0.017 per million input tokens and $0.11 per million output tokens; GLM-4.7-Flash lists at $0.06 and $0.40.

### Which has the bigger context window?

GLM-4.7-Flash does, with 200K tokens against 131K.

### How many benchmarks do GLM-4.7-Flash and Granite 4.0 Micro share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.7-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.0 Micro has 8.