# GLM-4.6V vs Solar Pro4

> GLM-4.6V and Solar Pro4 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.3 vs 42.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/glm-4-6v-vs-solar-pro4
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.6V scores higher in 2 categories and Solar Pro4 in 5 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- GLM-4.6V is cheaper at $0.30 / $0.90 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $1.20 for Solar Pro4.
- Solar Pro4 accepts more context: 524K tokens versus 128K.
- GLM-4.6V has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | GLM-4.6V | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Upstage |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 42.1 |
| Rank | 137 | 121 |
| Context | 128K | 524K |
| Input $/M | $0.30 | $0.30 |
| Output $/M | $0.90 | $1.20 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- GLM-4.6V: 40.9 (#128)
- Solar Pro4: 40.1 (#149)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1390 | 1437 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1371 |

## Reasoning

- GLM-4.6V: 27.6 (#115)
- Solar Pro4: 28.5 (#104)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1368 | 1399 |

## Math

- GLM-4.6V: —
- Solar Pro4: 38.8 (#128)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1416 |

## Knowledge

- GLM-4.6V: 38.0 (#149)
- Solar Pro4: 39.8 (#129)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1371 | 1427 |

## Multimodal

- GLM-4.6V: 34.8 (#90)
- Solar Pro4: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1164 | — |

## Multilingual

- GLM-4.6V: 48.6 (#141)
- Solar Pro4: 48.7 (#139)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1359 | 1361 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1425 | 1415 |
| LMArena Russian | 1340 | 1360 |
| LMArena French | — | 1397 |
| LMArena German | — | 1364 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1309 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1382 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1401 |

## Instruction Following

- GLM-4.6V: 71.4 (#151)
- Solar Pro4: 72.7 (#132)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1352 | 1377 |

## Long Context

- GLM-4.6V: 41.3 (#143)
- Solar Pro4: 42.1 (#130)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1358 | 1381 |

## Writing & Preference

- GLM-4.6V: 56.6 (#137)
- Solar Pro4: 56.5 (#138)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1377 | 1386 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1347 | 1316 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1360 | 1385 |

## FAQ

### Is GLM-4.6V better than Solar Pro4?

GLM-4.6V and Solar Pro4 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.3 vs 42.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Which is cheaper, GLM-4.6V or Solar Pro4?

GLM-4.6V is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $0.90 per million output tokens; Solar Pro4 lists at $0.30 and $1.20.

### Is GLM-4.6V or Solar Pro4 better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (40.9 vs 40.1); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Solar Pro4 does, with 524K tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do GLM-4.6V and Solar Pro4 share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.6V has 12 scored results on Noometry and Solar Pro4 has 18.