# GLM-4.6V vs Ring-2.6-1T

> GLM-4.6V has enough public results to be ranked (#137); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/glm-4-6v-vs-ring-2-6-1t
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Snapshot

| | GLM-4.6V | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Ant Group (inclusionAI) |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 36.9 |
| Rank | 137 | — |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.30 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.90 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- GLM-4.6V: 40.9 (#128)
- Ring-2.6-1T: 40.7

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 42.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1390 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 432.57 |

## Reasoning

- GLM-4.6V: 27.6 (#115)
- Ring-2.6-1T: 26.1

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 3.7% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1368 | — |

## Knowledge

- GLM-4.6V: 38.0 (#149)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1371 | — |

## Multimodal

- GLM-4.6V: 34.8 (#90)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1164 | — |

## Multilingual

- GLM-4.6V: 48.6 (#141)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1359 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1425 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1340 | — |

## Instruction Following

- GLM-4.6V: 71.4 (#151)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1352 | — |

## Long Context

- GLM-4.6V: 41.3 (#143)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1358 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- GLM-4.6V: 56.6 (#137)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1377 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1347 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1360 | — |

## FAQ

### Is GLM-4.6V better than Ring-2.6-1T?

GLM-4.6V has enough public results to be ranked (#137); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

### Is GLM-4.6V or Ring-2.6-1T better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (40.9 vs 40.7); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do GLM-4.6V and Ring-2.6-1T share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.6V has 12 scored results on Noometry and Ring-2.6-1T has 3.