# GLM-4.6V vs Qwen3.7 Plus

> Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 40.9 on the Noometry Index. GLM-4.6V costs 1.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.7 Plus's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/glm-4-6v-vs-qwen3-7-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.6V scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3.7 Plus in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Plus leads 54.9 to 37.4.
- GLM-4.6V is cheaper at $0.30 / $0.90 per million input/output tokens, against $0.40 / $1.60 for Qwen3.7 Plus.
- Qwen3.7 Plus accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 128K.
- GLM-4.6V has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | GLM-4.6V | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 40.9 | 45.0 |
| Rank | 133 | 66 |
| Context | 128K | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.30 | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | $0.90 | $1.60 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- GLM-4.6V: 40.2 (#128)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.1 (#200)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1390 | 1473 |
| FrontierCode | — | 10.2% |
| SciCode | — | 45.5% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- GLM-4.6V: —
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.2 (#130)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OSWorld 2.0 | — | 2.8% |

## Reasoning

- GLM-4.6V: 26.5 (#117)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 38.4 (#54)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1368 | 1460 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 74.8% |
| CritPt | — | 9.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 24% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 17% |
| DTBench | — | 84% |
| LMCA | — | 37.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 147.39 |

## Math

- GLM-4.6V: —
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 49.3 (#47)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 34.4% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 93.3% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1467 |

## Knowledge

- GLM-4.6V: 37.4 (#148)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#46)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1372 | 1467 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 87.9% |

## Multimodal

- GLM-4.6V: 34.2 (#83)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.2 (#30)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1164 | 1281 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1444 |

## Multilingual

- GLM-4.6V: 48.8 (#135)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 55.0 (#36)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1359 | 1445 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1426 | 1510 |
| LMArena Russian | 1341 | 1457 |
| LMArena French | — | 1471 |
| LMArena German | — | 1471 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1411 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1416 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1453 |

## Instruction Following

- GLM-4.6V: 71.6 (#145)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.9 (#49)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1351 | 1439 |

## Long Context

- GLM-4.6V: 41.3 (#138)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#61)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1358 | 1454 |

## Writing & Preference

- GLM-4.6V: 56.8 (#132)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.5 (#54)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1377 | 1454 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1347 | 1439 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1359 | 1459 |

## FAQ

### Is GLM-4.6V better than Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 40.9 on the Noometry Index. GLM-4.6V costs 1.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.7 Plus's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, GLM-4.6V or Qwen3.7 Plus?

GLM-4.6V is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $0.90 per million output tokens; Qwen3.7 Plus lists at $0.40 and $1.60.

### Is GLM-4.6V or Qwen3.7 Plus better for coding?

GLM-4.6V scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.2 versus 36.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.7 Plus does, with 1M tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do GLM-4.6V and Qwen3.7 Plus share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.6V has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.