# GLM-4.6V vs Qwen3.5 Max Preview

> Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/glm-4-6v-vs-qwen3-5-max-preview
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.6V scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5 Max Preview in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads 66.0 to 56.6.
- GLM-4.6V has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | GLM-4.6V | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 45.3 |
| Rank | 137 | 71 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.30 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.90 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- GLM-4.6V: 40.9 (#128)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 44.0 (#77)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1390 | 1487 |

## Reasoning

- GLM-4.6V: 27.6 (#115)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 30.8 (#84)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1368 | 1483 |

## Math

- GLM-4.6V: —
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 40.1 (#94)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1474 |

## Knowledge

- GLM-4.6V: 38.0 (#149)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 41.8 (#107)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1371 | 1489 |

## Multimodal

- GLM-4.6V: 34.8 (#90)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1164 | — |

## Multilingual

- GLM-4.6V: 48.6 (#141)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 56.2 (#22)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1359 | 1465 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1425 | 1534 |
| LMArena Russian | 1340 | 1471 |
| LMArena French | — | 1484 |
| LMArena German | — | 1487 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1495 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1438 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1470 |

## Instruction Following

- GLM-4.6V: 71.4 (#151)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 77.0 (#31)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1352 | 1467 |

## Long Context

- GLM-4.6V: 41.3 (#143)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 45.2 (#45)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1358 | 1476 |

## Writing & Preference

- GLM-4.6V: 56.6 (#137)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 66.0 (#41)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1377 | 1470 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1347 | 1464 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1360 | 1478 |

## FAQ

### Is GLM-4.6V better than Qwen3.5 Max Preview?

Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is GLM-4.6V or Qwen3.5 Max Preview better for coding?

Qwen3.5 Max Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 40.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do GLM-4.6V and Qwen3.5 Max Preview share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.6V has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Max Preview has 17.