# GLM-4.6V vs Qwen1.5-14B

> GLM-4.6V is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/glm-4-6v-vs-qwen1-5-14b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.6V scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen1.5-14B in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-4.6V leads 56.6 to 33.6.

## Snapshot

| | GLM-4.6V | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 32.7 |
| Rank | 137 | 253 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.30 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.90 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- GLM-4.6V: 40.9 (#128)
- Qwen1.5-14B: 33.1 (#263)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1390 | 1138 |

## Reasoning

- GLM-4.6V: 27.6 (#115)
- Qwen1.5-14B: 21.4 (#223)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1368 | 1113 |

## Math

- GLM-4.6V: —
- Qwen1.5-14B: 32.4 (#215)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1125 |

## Knowledge

- GLM-4.6V: 38.0 (#149)
- Qwen1.5-14B: 29.8 (#232)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1371 | 1094 |
| MMLU | — | 68.6% |

## Multimodal

- GLM-4.6V: 34.8 (#90)
- Qwen1.5-14B: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1164 | — |

## Multilingual

- GLM-4.6V: 48.6 (#141)
- Qwen1.5-14B: 30.7 (#262)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1359 | 1095 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1425 | 1147 |
| LMArena Russian | 1340 | 1046 |
| LMArena French | — | 1116 |
| LMArena German | — | 1043 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1019 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1085 |

## Instruction Following

- GLM-4.6V: 71.4 (#151)
- Qwen1.5-14B: 56.8 (#271)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1352 | 1102 |

## Long Context

- GLM-4.6V: 41.3 (#143)
- Qwen1.5-14B: 33.7 (#257)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1358 | 1113 |

## Writing & Preference

- GLM-4.6V: 56.6 (#137)
- Qwen1.5-14B: 33.6 (#276)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1377 | 1128 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1347 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1360 | 1110 |

## FAQ

### Is GLM-4.6V better than Qwen1.5-14B?

GLM-4.6V is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is GLM-4.6V or Qwen1.5-14B better for coding?

GLM-4.6V scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.9 versus 33.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do GLM-4.6V and Qwen1.5-14B share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.6V has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-14B has 17.