# GLM-4.6V vs Phi-4 Mini

> GLM-4.6V is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index. Phi-4 Mini costs 3.4× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GLM-4.6V's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/glm-4-6v-vs-phi-4-mini
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in coding, where GLM-4.6V leads 40.9 to 28.1.
- Phi-4 Mini is cheaper at $0.075 / $0.30 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $0.90 for GLM-4.6V.

## Snapshot

| | GLM-4.6V | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 30.9 |
| Rank | 137 | 283 |
| Context | 128K | 128K |
| Input $/M | $0.30 | $0.075 |
| Output $/M | $0.90 | $0.30 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- GLM-4.6V: 40.9 (#128)
- Phi-4 Mini: 28.1 (#317)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 10.8% |
| LMArena Coding | 1390 | — |

## Reasoning

- GLM-4.6V: 27.6 (#115)
- Phi-4 Mini: 22.4 (#195)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1368 | — |

## Knowledge

- GLM-4.6V: 38.0 (#149)
- Phi-4 Mini: 25.3 (#262)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 23.5% |
| LMArena Expert | 1371 | — |

## Multimodal

- GLM-4.6V: 34.8 (#90)
- Phi-4 Mini: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1164 | — |

## Multilingual

- GLM-4.6V: 48.6 (#141)
- Phi-4 Mini: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1359 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1425 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1340 | — |

## Instruction Following

- GLM-4.6V: 71.4 (#151)
- Phi-4 Mini: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1352 | — |

## Long Context

- GLM-4.6V: 41.3 (#143)
- Phi-4 Mini: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1358 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- GLM-4.6V: 56.6 (#137)
- Phi-4 Mini: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1377 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1347 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1360 | — |

## FAQ

### Is GLM-4.6V better than Phi-4 Mini?

GLM-4.6V is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index. Phi-4 Mini costs 3.4× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GLM-4.6V's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, GLM-4.6V or Phi-4 Mini?

Phi-4 Mini is cheaper. It lists at $0.075 per million input tokens and $0.30 per million output tokens; GLM-4.6V lists at $0.30 and $0.90.

### Is GLM-4.6V or Phi-4 Mini better for coding?

GLM-4.6V scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.9 versus 28.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 128K tokens.

### How many benchmarks do GLM-4.6V and Phi-4 Mini share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.6V has 12 scored results on Noometry and Phi-4 Mini has 3.