# GLM-4.6V vs Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct

> GLM-4.6V is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/glm-4-6v-vs-phi-3-mini-128k-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.6V scores higher in 7 categories and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-4.6V leads 56.6 to 27.1.

## Snapshot

| | GLM-4.6V | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 29.7 |
| Rank | 137 | 305 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.30 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.90 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- GLM-4.6V: 40.9 (#128)
- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 28.8 (#312)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1390 | 1039 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 29.6% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 40.6% |

## Reasoning

- GLM-4.6V: 27.6 (#115)
- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 19.6 (#256)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1368 | 1028 |

## Math

- GLM-4.6V: —
- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 31.6 (#222)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1089 |

## Knowledge

- GLM-4.6V: 38.0 (#149)
- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 26.8 (#254)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1371 | 984 |

## Multimodal

- GLM-4.6V: 34.8 (#90)
- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1164 | — |

## Multilingual

- GLM-4.6V: 48.6 (#141)
- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 25.2 (#285)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1359 | 1000 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1425 | 1016 |
| LMArena Russian | 1340 | 1004 |
| LMArena French | — | 1039 |
| LMArena German | — | 1006 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 899 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 856 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1059 |

## Instruction Following

- GLM-4.6V: 71.4 (#151)
- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 51.8 (#294)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1352 | 1023 |

## Long Context

- GLM-4.6V: 41.3 (#143)
- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 30.4 (#289)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1358 | 996 |

## Writing & Preference

- GLM-4.6V: 56.6 (#137)
- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 27.1 (#301)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1377 | 1050 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1347 | 1024 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1360 | 989 |

## FAQ

### Is GLM-4.6V better than Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct?

GLM-4.6V is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is GLM-4.6V or Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct better for coding?

GLM-4.6V scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.9 versus 28.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do GLM-4.6V and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.6V has 12 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has 19.