# GLM-4.6V vs Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct

> GLM-4.6V is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/glm-4-6v-vs-olmo-3-1-32b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.6V scores higher in 7 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-4.6V leads 56.8 to 50.4.

## Snapshot

| | GLM-4.6V | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 40.9 | 38.8 |
| Rank | 133 | 168 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.30 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.90 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- GLM-4.6V: 40.2 (#128)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 38.9 (#154)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1390 | 1346 |

## Reasoning

- GLM-4.6V: 26.5 (#117)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 25.4 (#131)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1368 | 1322 |

## Math

- GLM-4.6V: —
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 33.6 (#169)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1305 |

## Knowledge

- GLM-4.6V: 37.4 (#148)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 35.4 (#175)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1372 | 1307 |

## Multimodal

- GLM-4.6V: 34.2 (#83)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1164 | — |

## Multilingual

- GLM-4.6V: 48.8 (#135)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.8 (#185)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1359 | 1275 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1426 | 1304 |
| LMArena Russian | 1341 | 1268 |
| LMArena French | — | 1328 |
| LMArena German | — | 1283 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1206 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1337 |

## Instruction Following

- GLM-4.6V: 71.6 (#145)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.8 (#182)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1351 | 1298 |

## Long Context

- GLM-4.6V: 41.3 (#138)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#161)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1358 | 1312 |

## Writing & Preference

- GLM-4.6V: 56.8 (#132)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.4 (#179)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1377 | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1347 | 1264 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1359 | 1309 |

## FAQ

### Is GLM-4.6V better than Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct?

GLM-4.6V is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is GLM-4.6V or Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better for coding?

GLM-4.6V scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.2 versus 38.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do GLM-4.6V and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.6V has 12 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16.