# GLM-4.6V vs Mistral

> GLM-4.6V is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/glm-4-6v-vs-mistral
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.6V scores higher in 7 categories and Mistral in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where GLM-4.6V leads 37.4 to 16.3.
- GLM-4.6V has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | GLM-4.6V | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 40.9 | 29.4 |
| Rank | 133 | 297 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.30 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.90 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- GLM-4.6V: 40.2 (#128)
- Mistral: 33.2 (#249)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1390 | 1162 |

## Reasoning

- GLM-4.6V: 26.5 (#117)
- Mistral: 21.3 (#199)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1368 | 1149 |

## Math

- GLM-4.6V: —
- Mistral: 20.5 (#275)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | — | 7.2% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1180 |

## Knowledge

- GLM-4.6V: 37.4 (#148)
- Mistral: 16.3 (#283)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1372 | 1125 |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 27.7% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 30.3% |

## Multimodal

- GLM-4.6V: 34.2 (#83)
- Mistral: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1164 | — |

## Multilingual

- GLM-4.6V: 48.8 (#135)
- Mistral: 33.0 (#249)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1359 | 1129 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1426 | 1109 |
| LMArena Russian | 1341 | 1168 |
| LMArena French | — | 1179 |
| LMArena German | — | 1155 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1012 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1032 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1143 |

## Instruction Following

- GLM-4.6V: 71.6 (#145)
- Mistral: 52.9 (#283)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1351 | 1152 |
| IFEval | — | 56.8% |

## Long Context

- GLM-4.6V: 41.3 (#138)
- Mistral: 35.0 (#240)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1358 | 1154 |

## Writing & Preference

- GLM-4.6V: 56.8 (#132)
- Mistral: 37.2 (#255)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1377 | 1165 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1347 | 1158 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1359 | 1147 |
| WildBench | — | 66% |

## FAQ

### Is GLM-4.6V better than Mistral?

GLM-4.6V is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is GLM-4.6V or Mistral better for coding?

GLM-4.6V scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.2 versus 33.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do GLM-4.6V and Mistral share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.6V has 12 scored results on Noometry and Mistral has 22.