# GLM-4.6V vs MiniMax M1

> GLM-4.6V is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 39.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/glm-4-6v-vs-minimax-m1
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.6V scores higher in 6 categories and MiniMax M1 in 1 category; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-4.6V leads 56.8 to 53.3.
- GLM-4.6V is cheaper at $0.30 / $0.90 per million input/output tokens, against $0.40 / $2.20 for MiniMax M1.
- MiniMax M1 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 128K.

## Snapshot

| | GLM-4.6V | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 40.9 | 39.7 |
| Rank | 133 | 146 |
| Context | 128K | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.30 | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | $0.90 | $2.20 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- GLM-4.6V: 40.2 (#128)
- MiniMax M1: 39.2 (#149)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1390 | 1359 |

## Reasoning

- GLM-4.6V: 26.5 (#117)
- MiniMax M1: 25.8 (#125)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1368 | 1340 |

## Math

- GLM-4.6V: —
- MiniMax M1: 34.8 (#152)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1360 |

## Knowledge

- GLM-4.6V: 37.4 (#148)
- MiniMax M1: 35.7 (#168)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1372 | 1316 |

## Multimodal

- GLM-4.6V: 34.2 (#83)
- MiniMax M1: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1164 | — |

## Multilingual

- GLM-4.6V: 48.8 (#135)
- MiniMax M1: 46.0 (#157)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1359 | 1320 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1426 | 1361 |
| LMArena Russian | 1341 | 1330 |
| LMArena French | — | 1369 |
| LMArena German | — | 1350 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1220 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1263 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1354 |

## Instruction Following

- GLM-4.6V: 71.6 (#145)
- MiniMax M1: 69.5 (#169)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1351 | 1312 |

## Long Context

- GLM-4.6V: 41.3 (#138)
- MiniMax M1: 41.4 (#136)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1358 | 1326 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 69.4% |

## Writing & Preference

- GLM-4.6V: 56.8 (#132)
- MiniMax M1: 53.3 (#155)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1377 | 1343 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1347 | 1298 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1359 | 1335 |

## FAQ

### Is GLM-4.6V better than MiniMax M1?

GLM-4.6V is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 39.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, GLM-4.6V or MiniMax M1?

GLM-4.6V is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $0.90 per million output tokens; MiniMax M1 lists at $0.40 and $2.20.

### Is GLM-4.6V or MiniMax M1 better for coding?

GLM-4.6V scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.2 versus 39.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

MiniMax M1 does, with 1M tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do GLM-4.6V and MiniMax M1 share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.6V has 12 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax M1 has 18.