# GLM-4.6V vs Granite 4.0 H Small

> GLM-4.6V is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/glm-4-6v-vs-ibm-granite-h-small
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.6V scores higher in 7 categories and Granite 4.0 H Small in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-4.6V leads 56.6 to 43.8.

## Snapshot

| | GLM-4.6V | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | IBM |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 36.5 |
| Rank | 137 | 214 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.30 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.90 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- GLM-4.6V: 40.9 (#128)
- Granite 4.0 H Small: 36.4 (#209)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1390 | 1249 |

## Reasoning

- GLM-4.6V: 27.6 (#115)
- Granite 4.0 H Small: 24.4 (#163)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1368 | 1240 |

## Math

- GLM-4.6V: —
- Granite 4.0 H Small: 31.4 (#223)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | — | 29.6% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1247 |

## Knowledge

- GLM-4.6V: 38.0 (#149)
- Granite 4.0 H Small: 32.0 (#215)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1371 | 1251 |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 56.9% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.2% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 38.3% |

## Multimodal

- GLM-4.6V: 34.8 (#90)
- Granite 4.0 H Small: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1164 | — |

## Multilingual

- GLM-4.6V: 48.6 (#141)
- Granite 4.0 H Small: 38.6 (#228)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1359 | 1216 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1425 | 1249 |
| LMArena Russian | 1340 | 1201 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1258 |

## Instruction Following

- GLM-4.6V: 71.4 (#151)
- Granite 4.0 H Small: 68.7 (#183)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1352 | 1222 |
| IFEval | — | 89% |

## Long Context

- GLM-4.6V: 41.3 (#143)
- Granite 4.0 H Small: 37.7 (#213)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1358 | 1242 |

## Writing & Preference

- GLM-4.6V: 56.6 (#137)
- Granite 4.0 H Small: 43.8 (#227)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1377 | 1241 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1347 | 1211 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1360 | 1242 |
| WildBench | — | 73.9% |

## FAQ

### Is GLM-4.6V better than Granite 4.0 H Small?

GLM-4.6V is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Is GLM-4.6V or Granite 4.0 H Small better for coding?

GLM-4.6V scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.9 versus 36.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do GLM-4.6V and Granite 4.0 H Small share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.6V has 12 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.0 H Small has 19.