# GLM-4.6V vs Hunyuan T1 20250711

> Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/glm-4-6v-vs-hunyuan-t1
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.6V scores higher in 1 category and Hunyuan T1 20250711 in 6 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- GLM-4.6V has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | GLM-4.6V | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 42.5 |
| Rank | 137 | 114 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.30 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.90 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- GLM-4.6V: 40.9 (#128)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1390 | 1390 |

## Reasoning

- GLM-4.6V: 27.6 (#115)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1368 | 1399 |

## Math

- GLM-4.6V: —
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1414 |

## Knowledge

- GLM-4.6V: 38.0 (#149)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1371 | 1395 |

## Multimodal

- GLM-4.6V: 34.8 (#90)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1164 | — |

## Multilingual

- GLM-4.6V: 48.6 (#141)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1359 | 1395 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1425 | 1425 |
| LMArena Russian | 1340 | 1385 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1406 |

## Instruction Following

- GLM-4.6V: 71.4 (#151)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1352 | 1374 |

## Long Context

- GLM-4.6V: 41.3 (#143)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1358 | 1384 |

## Writing & Preference

- GLM-4.6V: 56.6 (#137)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1377 | 1401 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1347 | 1392 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1360 | 1393 |

## FAQ

### Is GLM-4.6V better than Hunyuan T1 20250711?

Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is GLM-4.6V or Hunyuan T1 20250711 better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (40.9 vs 40.9); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do GLM-4.6V and Hunyuan T1 20250711 share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.6V has 12 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13.