# GLM-4.6V vs Grok 4.3

> Grok 4.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 40.9 on the Noometry Index. GLM-4.6V costs 3.5× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Grok 4.3's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/glm-4-6v-vs-grok-4-3
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.6V scores higher in 1 category and Grok 4.3 in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Grok 4.3 leads 52.5 to 37.4.
- GLM-4.6V is cheaper at $0.30 / $0.90 per million input/output tokens, against $1.25 / $2.50 for Grok 4.3.
- Grok 4.3 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 128K.
- GLM-4.6V has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | GLM-4.6V | Grok 4.3 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 40.9 | 43.6 |
| Rank | 133 | 80 |
| Context | 128K | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.30 | $1.25 |
| Output $/M | $0.90 | $2.50 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- GLM-4.6V: 40.2 (#128)
- Grok 4.3: 41.3 (#117)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Grok 4.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1390 | 1415 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1357 |
| SciCode | — | 47.3% |
| WeirdML | — | 49.9% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 944.17 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- GLM-4.6V: —
- Grok 4.3: 27.6 (#93)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Grok 4.3 |
|---|---|---|
| GDP.pdf | — | 8% |
| LMArena Search | — | 1165 |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 35.26 |

## Reasoning

- GLM-4.6V: 26.5 (#117)
- Grok 4.3: 34.9 (#60)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Grok 4.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1368 | 1397 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 55.2% |
| CritPt | — | 8% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 25% |
| DTBench | — | 90.7% |
| LMCA | — | 38.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 149.13 |
| ForecastBench | — | 60.3 |

## Math

- GLM-4.6V: —
- Grok 4.3: 45.8 (#60)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Grok 4.3 |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 42.8% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 14.6% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 93.3% |
| ProofBench | — | 11% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1388 |

## Knowledge

- GLM-4.6V: 37.4 (#148)
- Grok 4.3: 52.5 (#57)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Grok 4.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1372 | 1385 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 88.8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 33.2% |

## Multimodal

- GLM-4.6V: 34.2 (#83)
- Grok 4.3: 31.6 (#96)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Grok 4.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1164 | 1231 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | — | 0% |

## Multilingual

- GLM-4.6V: 48.8 (#135)
- Grok 4.3: 50.7 (#114)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Grok 4.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1359 | 1385 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1426 | 1423 |
| LMArena Russian | 1341 | 1399 |
| LMArena French | — | 1412 |
| LMArena German | — | 1395 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1379 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1357 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1402 |

## Instruction Following

- GLM-4.6V: 71.6 (#145)
- Grok 4.3: 72.3 (#135)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Grok 4.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1351 | 1366 |

## Long Context

- GLM-4.6V: 41.3 (#138)
- Grok 4.3: 42.5 (#118)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Grok 4.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1358 | 1393 |

## Writing & Preference

- GLM-4.6V: 56.8 (#132)
- Grok 4.3: 58.6 (#112)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Grok 4.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1377 | 1397 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1347 | 1380 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1359 | 1406 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1075 |

## FAQ

### Is GLM-4.6V better than Grok 4.3?

Grok 4.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 40.9 on the Noometry Index. GLM-4.6V costs 3.5× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Grok 4.3's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, GLM-4.6V or Grok 4.3?

GLM-4.6V is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $0.90 per million output tokens; Grok 4.3 lists at $1.25 and $2.50.

### Is GLM-4.6V or Grok 4.3 better for coding?

Grok 4.3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.3 versus 40.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Grok 4.3 does, with 1M tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do GLM-4.6V and Grok 4.3 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.6V has 12 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.3 has 40.