# GLM-4.6V vs Grok 4.1

> GLM-4.6V and Grok 4.1 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (40.9 vs 40.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/glm-4-6v-vs-grok-4-1
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.6V scores higher in 1 category and Grok 4.1 in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where GLM-4.6V leads 40.2 to 33.4.
- GLM-4.6V has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | GLM-4.6V | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 40.9 | 40.8 |
| Rank | 133 | 135 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.30 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.90 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- GLM-4.6V: 40.2 (#128)
- Grok 4.1: 33.4 (#246)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1390 | 1445 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1214 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- GLM-4.6V: —
- Grok 4.1: 33.8 (#47)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | — | 39% |

## Reasoning

- GLM-4.6V: 26.5 (#117)
- Grok 4.1: 28.3 (#91)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1368 | 1436 |

## Math

- GLM-4.6V: —
- Grok 4.1: 36.2 (#124)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1422 |

## Knowledge

- GLM-4.6V: 37.4 (#148)
- Grok 4.1: 38.9 (#129)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1372 | 1417 |

## Multimodal

- GLM-4.6V: 34.2 (#83)
- Grok 4.1: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1164 | — |

## Multilingual

- GLM-4.6V: 48.8 (#135)
- Grok 4.1: 53.6 (#64)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1359 | 1425 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1426 | 1464 |
| LMArena Russian | 1341 | 1434 |
| LMArena French | — | 1448 |
| LMArena German | — | 1447 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1396 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1407 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1438 |

## Instruction Following

- GLM-4.6V: 71.6 (#145)
- Grok 4.1: 74.0 (#106)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1351 | 1400 |

## Long Context

- GLM-4.6V: 41.3 (#138)
- Grok 4.1: 43.2 (#96)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1358 | 1416 |

## Writing & Preference

- GLM-4.6V: 56.8 (#132)
- Grok 4.1: 62.6 (#71)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1377 | 1437 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1347 | 1411 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1359 | 1438 |

## FAQ

### Is GLM-4.6V better than Grok 4.1?

GLM-4.6V and Grok 4.1 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (40.9 vs 40.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is GLM-4.6V or Grok 4.1 better for coding?

GLM-4.6V scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.2 versus 33.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do GLM-4.6V and Grok 4.1 share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.6V has 12 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.1 has 19.