# GLM-4.6V vs Grok-3 mini

> GLM-4.6V and Grok-3 mini score almost the same on the Noometry Index (40.9 vs 41.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/glm-4-6v-vs-grok-3-mini
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.6V scores higher in 4 categories and Grok-3 mini in 3 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GLM-4.6V leads 26.5 to 13.8.
- GLM-4.6V has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | GLM-4.6V | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 40.9 | 41.0 |
| Rank | 133 | 130 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.30 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.90 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- GLM-4.6V: 40.2 (#128)
- Grok-3 mini: 40.4 (#126)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1390 | 1380 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 49.3% |
| WeirdML | — | 42.6% |

## Reasoning

- GLM-4.6V: 26.5 (#117)
- Grok-3 mini: 13.8 (#323)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1368 | 1374 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0.4% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 61.3% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 16.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 140.35 |

## Math

- GLM-4.6V: —
- Grok-3 mini: 40.3 (#78)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 77.8% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 31.8% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1386 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 90.9% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 5.9% |

## Knowledge

- GLM-4.6V: 37.4 (#148)
- Grok-3 mini: 46.3 (#75)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1372 | 1395 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 76.3% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 79.9% |
| Confabulations | — | 10.8% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 67.5% |

## Multimodal

- GLM-4.6V: 34.2 (#83)
- Grok-3 mini: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1164 | — |

## Multilingual

- GLM-4.6V: 48.8 (#135)
- Grok-3 mini: 48.3 (#141)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1359 | 1352 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1426 | 1387 |
| LMArena Russian | 1341 | 1352 |
| LMArena French | — | 1357 |
| LMArena German | — | 1350 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1343 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1336 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1379 |

## Instruction Following

- GLM-4.6V: 71.6 (#145)
- Grok-3 mini: 78.7 (#8)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1351 | 1356 |
| IFEval | — | 95.1% |

## Long Context

- GLM-4.6V: 41.3 (#138)
- Grok-3 mini: 41.0 (#142)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1358 | 1372 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |

## Writing & Preference

- GLM-4.6V: 56.8 (#132)
- Grok-3 mini: 52.7 (#163)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1377 | 1370 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1347 | 1342 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1359 | 1355 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 73.5% |
| WildBench | — | 65.1% |

## FAQ

### Is GLM-4.6V better than Grok-3 mini?

GLM-4.6V and Grok-3 mini score almost the same on the Noometry Index (40.9 vs 41.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is GLM-4.6V or Grok-3 mini better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (40.2 vs 40.4); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do GLM-4.6V and Grok-3 mini share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.6V has 12 scored results on Noometry and Grok-3 mini has 35.