# GLM-4.6V vs Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13

> GLM-4.6V is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 37.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/glm-4-6v-vs-grok-2-mini
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.6V scores higher in 7 categories and Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-4.6V leads 56.8 to 47.5.
- GLM-4.6V has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | GLM-4.6V | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 40.9 | 37.0 |
| Rank | 133 | 196 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.30 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.90 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- GLM-4.6V: 40.2 (#128)
- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 36.4 (#194)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1390 | 1269 |

## Reasoning

- GLM-4.6V: 26.5 (#117)
- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 23.7 (#162)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1368 | 1255 |

## Math

- GLM-4.6V: —
- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 32.8 (#185)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1265 |

## Knowledge

- GLM-4.6V: 37.4 (#148)
- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 33.4 (#195)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1372 | 1238 |

## Multimodal

- GLM-4.6V: 34.2 (#83)
- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1164 | — |

## Multilingual

- GLM-4.6V: 48.8 (#135)
- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 41.6 (#203)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1359 | 1257 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1426 | 1262 |
| LMArena Russian | 1341 | 1261 |
| LMArena French | — | 1285 |
| LMArena German | — | 1273 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1213 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1195 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1278 |

## Instruction Following

- GLM-4.6V: 71.6 (#145)
- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 65.7 (#215)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1351 | 1245 |

## Long Context

- GLM-4.6V: 41.3 (#138)
- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 38.4 (#191)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1358 | 1267 |

## Writing & Preference

- GLM-4.6V: 56.8 (#132)
- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 47.5 (#207)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1377 | 1281 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1347 | 1242 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1359 | 1265 |

## FAQ

### Is GLM-4.6V better than Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13?

GLM-4.6V is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 37.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is GLM-4.6V or Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 better for coding?

GLM-4.6V scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.2 versus 36.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do GLM-4.6V and Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.6V has 12 scored results on Noometry and Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 has 17.