# GLM-4.6V vs Granite 4.2 8B

> GLM-4.6V and Granite 4.2 8B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (40.9 vs 40.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/glm-4-6v-vs-granite-4-2-8b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.6V scores higher in 6 categories and Granite 4.2 8B in 1 category; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-4.6V leads 56.8 to 49.8.
- Granite 4.2 8B is cheaper at $0.06 / $0.25 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $0.90 for GLM-4.6V.
- Granite 4.2 8B accepts more context: 131K tokens versus 128K.

## Snapshot

| | GLM-4.6V | Granite 4.2 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | IBM |
| Noometry Index | 40.9 | 40.0 |
| Rank | 133 | 143 |
| Context | 128K | 131K |
| Input $/M | $0.30 | $0.06 |
| Output $/M | $0.90 | $0.25 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- GLM-4.6V: 40.2 (#128)
- Granite 4.2 8B: 39.9 (#138)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Granite 4.2 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1390 | 1379 |

## Reasoning

- GLM-4.6V: 26.5 (#117)
- Granite 4.2 8B: 25.5 (#130)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Granite 4.2 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1368 | 1327 |

## Knowledge

- GLM-4.6V: 37.4 (#148)
- Granite 4.2 8B: 37.7 (#144)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Granite 4.2 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1372 | 1380 |

## Multimodal

- GLM-4.6V: 34.2 (#83)
- Granite 4.2 8B: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Granite 4.2 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1164 | — |

## Multilingual

- GLM-4.6V: 48.8 (#135)
- Granite 4.2 8B: 44.5 (#173)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Granite 4.2 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1359 | 1299 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1426 | 1361 |
| LMArena Russian | 1341 | 1283 |

## Instruction Following

- GLM-4.6V: 71.6 (#145)
- Granite 4.2 8B: 68.7 (#183)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Granite 4.2 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1351 | 1298 |

## Long Context

- GLM-4.6V: 41.3 (#138)
- Granite 4.2 8B: 40.2 (#154)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Granite 4.2 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1358 | 1323 |

## Writing & Preference

- GLM-4.6V: 56.8 (#132)
- Granite 4.2 8B: 49.8 (#183)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Granite 4.2 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1377 | 1319 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1347 | 1238 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1359 | 1299 |

## FAQ

### Is GLM-4.6V better than Granite 4.2 8B?

GLM-4.6V and Granite 4.2 8B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (40.9 vs 40.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Which is cheaper, GLM-4.6V or Granite 4.2 8B?

Granite 4.2 8B is cheaper. It lists at $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.25 per million output tokens; GLM-4.6V lists at $0.30 and $0.90.

### Is GLM-4.6V or Granite 4.2 8B better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (40.2 vs 39.9); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Granite 4.2 8B does, with 131K tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do GLM-4.6V and Granite 4.2 8B share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.6V has 12 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.2 8B has 11.