# GLM-4.6V vs GPT-4.1 mini

> GLM-4.6V is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 33.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/glm-4-6v-vs-gpt-4-1-mini
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.6V scores higher in 6 categories and GPT-4.1 mini in 2 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GLM-4.6V leads 26.5 to 10.9.
- GLM-4.6V is cheaper at $0.30 / $0.90 per million input/output tokens, against $0.40 / $1.60 for GPT-4.1 mini.
- GPT-4.1 mini accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 128K.
- GLM-4.6V has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | GLM-4.6V | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 40.9 | 33.5 |
| Rank | 133 | 232 |
| Context | 128K | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | $0.30 | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | $0.90 | $1.60 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- GLM-4.6V: 40.2 (#128)
- GPT-4.1 mini: 30.4 (#286)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1390 | 1367 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 23.9% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 32.4% |
| SciCode | — | 40.4% |
| WeirdML | — | 37.6% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 48.9% |
| CadEval | — | 16% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- GLM-4.6V: —
- GPT-4.1 mini: 33.0 (#52)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 50.5% |

## Reasoning

- GLM-4.6V: 26.5 (#117)
- GPT-4.1 mini: 10.9 (#335)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1368 | 1349 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 48.6% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 3.5% |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 7% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 7% |
| DTBench | — | 68.8% |
| LMCA | — | 21.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 135.01 |

## Math

- GLM-4.6V: —
- GPT-4.1 mini: 23.1 (#264)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 6.7% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 44.7% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 49.1% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1343 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 87.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 4.5% |

## Knowledge

- GLM-4.6V: 37.4 (#148)
- GPT-4.1 mini: 34.7 (#183)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1372 | 1338 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 65.8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 12.7% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 78.3% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 61.4% |

## Multimodal

- GLM-4.6V: 34.2 (#83)
- GPT-4.1 mini: 35.2 (#77)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1164 | 1181 |

## Multilingual

- GLM-4.6V: 48.8 (#135)
- GPT-4.1 mini: 45.9 (#161)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1359 | 1318 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1426 | 1329 |
| LMArena Russian | 1341 | 1324 |
| LMArena French | — | 1357 |
| LMArena German | — | 1349 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1291 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1298 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1319 |

## Instruction Following

- GLM-4.6V: 71.6 (#145)
- GPT-4.1 mini: 73.9 (#113)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1351 | 1332 |
| IFEval | — | 90.4% |

## Long Context

- GLM-4.6V: 41.3 (#138)
- GPT-4.1 mini: 31.8 (#270)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1358 | 1344 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 44.4% |

## Writing & Preference

- GLM-4.6V: 56.8 (#132)
- GPT-4.1 mini: 48.8 (#193)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1377 | 1341 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1347 | 1300 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1359 | 1354 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1147 |
| WildBench | — | 83.8% |

## FAQ

### Is GLM-4.6V better than GPT-4.1 mini?

GLM-4.6V is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 33.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, GLM-4.6V or GPT-4.1 mini?

GLM-4.6V is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $0.90 per million output tokens; GPT-4.1 mini lists at $0.40 and $1.60.

### Is GLM-4.6V or GPT-4.1 mini better for coding?

GLM-4.6V scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.2 versus 30.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-4.1 mini does, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do GLM-4.6V and GPT-4.1 mini share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.6V has 12 scored results on Noometry and GPT-4.1 mini has 47.